0

After having ___ arguments virtually every other day,the couple agreed that it was best for them to separate.

A) bitter B) saturnine C) astringent D) effulgent E) acrimonious F) assiduous

This is a GRE sentence completion question, Type: Sentence Equivalence, which means that two most suitable options for the sentence are to be selected from the given options. So, basically the selected words will be synonyms of each other.

Here, I am confused about 'bitter', 'astringent', and 'acrimonious' because these are synonyms of each other. And my book has 'bitter' and 'acrimonious' as the answer. Why not 'astringent'?

  • 1
    'astringent' is not as metaphorical as 'bitter' – Mitch Jun 18 '15 at 19:09
  • 1
    It may just be that "bitter argument" and "acrimonious argument" are idiomatic while "astringent argument" is not. I don't know whether there is a logical explanation for this. (By the way, standard English style calls for a space to be placed after a punctuation mark like . or ,.) – Nate Eldredge Jun 18 '15 at 19:11
  • It's deadly stuff this, isn't it? Humourless and artificial. I like all the words suggested; the "wrong" ones are stimulating and creative, with a greater depth of meaning than the "right" ones. We only know they're right because we deduce their meaning from the rest of the sentence, so they're really redundant, aren't they? @Amrapali: you have my sympathy. Why not "astringent", indeed? – Margana Jun 18 '15 at 19:26
  • 1
    Collocation is also important in English. Though strong and powerful are synonyms (and I'd add 'close'), 'powerful tea' and 'a strong computer' are unacceptable. – Edwin Ashworth Jun 18 '15 at 22:16
  • 1
    "Astringent" simply isn't idiomatic for the context. Even though it can mean "sharp or severe in manner or style", the most familiar meaning (in the US, at least) is "causing the contraction of body tissues", and that's a poor fit to the sentence. – Hot Licks Aug 27 '16 at 22:43
2

As Edwin Ashworth suggests in a comment above, the formulators of this GRE test question must be relying on a difference in collocation between (on the one hand) "bitter arguments" and "acrimonious arguments" and (on the other) "astringent arguments."

A Google Books Ngram chart for "bitter arguments" (blue line) versus "acrimonious arguments" (red line) versus "astringent arguments" (no line, due to "Ngrams not found") shows the preferences of writers represented in the Google Books database over the period 1900–2005:

But this is far from saying that "astringent arguments" is outlandish or incoherent as an expression. Google Books searches for "astringent argument[s]" turn up a number of matches from presumably competent English speakers and writers, going back to this instance from the speech of Henry Brougham, counsel to Queen Caroline, in "Bill of Pains and Penalties against her Majesty" (August 17, 1820), reprinted in The Parliamentary Debates from the Year 1803 to the Present (1821):

But how can your lordships be reconciled to such a deed [divorce] in the extraordinary manner proposed by this bill, where the husband himself does not, as in every other instance of divorce, come forward to make any application for the measure? My learned friends on the other side, in order to get rid of the astringent arguments which they had reason to apprehend upon this point, on the part of my client, have, no doubt, told your lordships, that the king [George IV] is no party to the present application. But my learned friend, the attorney-general, when certain questions were put to him, could hardly tell whence he came, how, by whom he was sent, or with whom the present prosecution originated, although he could say that the king was no party to the measure.

Also noteworthy is this instance from James Baldwin, "The Black Boy Looks at the White Boy" in Esquire (May 1961), reprinted in The Price of the Ticket: Collected Nonfiction, 1948–1985 (1985):

Norman [Mailer] has many qualities and faults, but I have never heard anyone accuse him of possessing this particular one [an inability to anticipate people's reactions to his work]. But Malaquais's opinion seemed to mean a great deal to him—this astonished me, too; and there was a running, good-natured but astringent argument between them, with Malaquais playing the role of the old lion and Norman playing the the role of the powerful but clumsy cub. And, I must say, I think that each of them got a great deal of pleasure out of the other's performance.

There even happens to be an occurrence of the phrase in a periodical from the Scottish Academic Press titled The Use of English (1985):

Lack of space prevents me from doing justice to the astringent argument and style of Mr. Lee's reevaluation. 'What can be said ...?' etc. came up in an exchange of correspondence in 1979.

"Astringent arguments" is clearly not a meaningless phrase in English. Consequently, the basis upon which the GRE test formulator deems "astringent" an incorrect answer to the given fill-in-the-blank question must be that "bitter arguments" and "acrimonious arguments" are far more common in written (and presumably spoken) English than "astringent arguments" is.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.