24

I've been reading a facsimile edition of Defoe's Captain Singleton and have noticed a little quirk of the text; where an st or a ct appear, they are joined with a little curl over the top, but nt, rt and pt aren't. This appears to be the case wherever these combinations appear in a word.

Is there any linguistic significance to this, or is it just a quirk of the printers?

(I have been unable to find an example of this sort of text anywhere online; can anyone help?)

3
  • 8
    I am not sure whether there is any linguistic significance, but these are called ligatures: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typographic_ligature The s‍t and c‍t ligatures are mentioned there.
    – user3286
    Commented May 12, 2011 at 21:41
  • 1
    The main significance is that they drove typesetters crazy during the transition first to Linotype and then to early computerized typesetting.
    – Hot Licks
    Commented Jan 19, 2021 at 1:55
  • 1
    They have no more significance than the dots on the lowercase i and j. They're just passing fads in typography, like long ſ in succeſs. Commented Oct 1, 2022 at 16:36

4 Answers 4

25

As Vitaly mentioned, this is a ligature: two letters are connected as if written without lifting the pen off the paper.

Ligatures were very common in the Middle Ages, and probably in Antiquity as well. Often the shape of a ligature changed away from its constituent letters with time, so as to render them unrecognisable in some cases. There were thousands of ligatures and abbreviations. Because ligatures usually take a bit less space than full letters, they were a means to save (expensive) paper; and the fact that scribes did not need to lift their pens off the paper as often saved time.

Ligatures are of course much less useful in print. Only some minor economy of space might conceivably be attained; the reason why some ligatures made it into print from time to time is probably tradition.

Generally there was no difference in meaning between ligature and full writing. It is true that certain ligatures are used much more often in one word than in another; the ligature &, which stood for et, was extremely common in the Latin word et ("and"), but significantly less so in other words, though it could be used in any word, such as car&. Nevertheless, this ligature came to be associated with the word et so much that it carried over into other languages, even though the full word would be entirely different, like English and.

The ct ligature is quite natural in Medieval script; I have never seen it used with a specific meaning, and it cannot stand for an entire word on itself. That is why I believe it is applied mostly at random, i.e. it depends on the scribe.

Even so, it is possible that certain printers had specific conventions when to use it; these are unknown to me, and I bet nearly all readers wouldn't know the reason behind such conventions either, if such existed.


If you're interested in Medieval ligatures, you might like to browse Cappelli's dictionary of Latin abbreviations (or its English translation). Some of the Latin ligatures stood for letter combinations that were also useful in other languages and were often so used. Each language also developed some abbreviations and ligatures of its own, but the Latin ones were always the basis. Here is a page displaying the et ligature:

Cappelli, "et"

Here is a page of Latin manuscript, where you can see how many ligatures and abbreviations they used:

Nearly every mark or line indicates that something is left out or abbreviated. However, notice that this scribe didn't use the ct ligature, for no apparent reason; such variation is mostly arbitrary and depends on the scribe and his teachers.

2
  • These look like contractions to me: am I wrong, or are ligature and contraction synonyms? Commented May 29, 2011 at 20:51
  • @TimLymington: Ehm, no, they are different things. Perhaps this text isn't the best of examples. The contractions and abbreviations, which may or may not entail ligatures, are what's most striking in this page. But you can also see various ligatures, such as ci, fa, i9 (this "9" is the sign for either con- or -us or their variants), pe, oe, &c. Some ligatures are merely letters written so close together that they touch, while others involve additional connecting lines or the omission of a certain part of one or both of the letters, where a single serves as a part of both letters. Commented May 29, 2011 at 22:31
6

Those are ligatures. The most familiar ligature to modern English-speaking audiences is fi, a ligature of the f and i glyphs. When printed together, the top serif of the lowercase f often merges unattractively with the dot of the lowercase i, so typographers substituted a ligature of the two characters that fit together harmoniously.

The st and ct ligatures you mention are rare, but occur in some typefaces, typically older or more traditional ones. The Wikipedia article includes an illustration of the st and ct ligatures in the Adobe Caslon Pro typeface. In this case, the ligatures have been created for aesthetic reasons rather than practical ones, as the s and c characters would not merge with the t with normal kerning.

1
  • I am reading a book that includes Python code. The Python is rendered in a monospaced font, which should write the f and i in field as two characters with the same width as mm. In an unexpected manner, the typesetters rendered fi ligature with kerning, replete with the dot from the i deleted and subsumed by the crossbar in the f. I find that this slows down my reading of the code.
    – rajah9
    Commented Oct 1, 2022 at 13:54
1

whilst ligatures may have lost their original function in modern print, that is to say printing from digital files, they were (and still are) an essential part of traditional letterpress printing - that is, printing from metal type. Original metal type is cast so that each letterform sits on its own block, or 'body'. When certain combinations of letters are used, (for example 'fi' or 'fl') it is physically impossible to reduce the spacing, or 'kerning', enough so that these combinations appear to have the same kerning as the rest of the type. This is due to the width of the block, or body of the type, that the letterform sits on. If you were to scan your eyes over something letterpress printed from metal type where ligatures had not been used, the spaces between combinations such as 'fi' and 'fl' would appear too large. So the only way to achieve kerning that is visually correct, is to combine these letter combinations into one single block, known as a ligature. This allows the two letterforms to invade or overhang each other's space slightly, and results in visually correct kerning.

1
  • 2
    Please cite your sources. Welcome to the site. I encourage you to take the tour and see the help center to improve your answer.
    – livresque
    Commented Jan 19, 2021 at 2:40
0

(I have been unable to find an example of this sort of text anywhere online; can anyone help?)

Sure:

https://fhur.me/posts/why-read-dostoevsky

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.