Just now I was walking my dogs down S St. in Sacramento. We were gaining on a woman walking in front of us, when she turned around to see who was behind her.

"Sorry," I said. "We aren't going to run you down."

She smiled. "No, it's just that I heard this jingling behind me, and it was getting closer. But they aren't menacing," she said, referring to my dogs.

"Well, sometimes they are. But they're in a good mood right now."

Was my last statement entirely accurate?

Certainly it was crystal clear to my interlocutor and me—both of whom, if it isn't obvious, are fluent English speakers—but was there a logical and/or grammatical looseness in my language that we both tolerated, or was I, strictly speaking, correct?

Let me restate my question: In saying that my dogs were in "a good mood," did I imply that they were in a single good mood? What I meant to imply is that each of the dogs was in a good mood—which may or may not have been exactly the same good mood.

Consider the following phrase offered by user WS2 in the comments:

Hilda and Charles were both in good moods this morning.

Therefore, should I have said my dogs were in "good moods," leaving open that the moods might have been, in a subtle way, different?

  • 3
    The prepositional phrase 'in a good mood' is a fixed expression, and, like an adjective (well, all except possibly 'blond'),, does not inflect. Commented Jun 5, 2015 at 21:42
  • 2
    From Grammarist: << Blond vs. blonde In French, blond is masculine and blonde is feminine. This distinction generally extends to the English adjectives, especially in British English, where blonde is more common than blond (mainly because the word is used in reference to females more often than than to males). In American and Canadian English, blond is generally preferred over blonde in all cases—even in reference to female hair color—though a minority of writers continue to observe the gender distinction. In any ... Commented Jun 5, 2015 at 21:48
  • 2
    case, using blonde in reference to male hair is simply a misspelling. >> // I've answered the question, but I'd say the question is more appropriate for ELL than ELU. Commented Jun 5, 2015 at 21:49
  • 2
    @EdwinAshworth Hilda and Charles were both in good moods this morning. I honestly don't see how any grammarian could dogmatically argue against it. That is not to say that H & C were both in a good mood is not equally valid. But there might well be a contextual reason for preferring the former. That's all I'm saying.
    – WS2
    Commented Jun 6, 2015 at 7:58
  • 2
    I think this is a good question as currently expressed, and I've voted to reopen it. With regard to the question of idiom or not, it might be interesting to compare "in a good mood/in good moods" with "in a good frame of mind/in good frames of mind." I think that English speakers tend to go with the unitary wording not because we imagine that everyone has the same mood (or frame of mind) but because everyone has just one at any particular moment—and we apply it across multiple perhaps because we are referring to the possessors of the mood jointly AND severally. Anyway, interesting question.
    – Sven Yargs
    Commented Jun 6, 2015 at 22:25

2 Answers 2


Use of 'are in good moods'

Different Google Books searches for "are in good moods" yield different results, depending on time frame chosen and additional words chosen to include with the phrase, but a search specifically for "are in good moods" across the period 1700–2005 turns up only 43 matches. The earliest match I found is from V. S. Srinivasa Sastri, Lectures on the Ramayana, (1961) [combined snippets]:

For we all know from experience that neither the best nor the lowest amongst us, neither men nor women, neither Westerners nor Easterners, none who is human, is able to occupy one level of thought, one level of action, and one level of function; we go up sometimes when we are in good moods, receptive of ethical notions, conscious of our duties, comparatively strong to resist temptations, in noble surroundings, amidst noble people, thinking noble thoughts and capable of doing noble deeds. Alas! such moments are not always available.

Another fairly early instance occurs in a twilight-of-the-USSR offering from Andrei Frelov & Lois Becker Frelov, Against the Odds: A True American-Soviet Love Story (1983) [combined snippets]:

In the Soviet Union people do not smile as often. They buy things of poor quality from the government, and even these inferior items do not exist in quantities sufficient for normal life. Therefore, people are often in a bad temper, and insult one another with no apparent cause. But, at the Central Market in Moscow, where farmers receive good money for the vegetables and other foods that they have raised on their own private parcels of land, the picture is completely different. These people try to satisfy and please their customers. They are in good moods. They are polite, like in America.

Notice the contrast between the fifth sentence ("They are in good moods") and the wording of a comparable construction in the third sentence ("people are often in a bad temper"—rather than, as one might expect from the model of the fifth sentence, "people are often in bad tempers").

Something similar happens in this match from Andrea Henkart & Journey Henkart, Cool Communication: A Mother and Daughter Reveal the Keys to Mutual Understanding Between Parents and Kids (1998):

If something comes up that you really want to do and your parents won't let you do it, try to reason with them by discussing it. The trick is to calmly let them know why something may be so important to you. Usually the best time to explain things is not in the heat of the moment. It is definitely not a good idea to try to work things out during, or even right after, a fight. Whenever you decide to talk to your parents, make sure they are in good moods. They will listen better when they don't have so many other things on their minds. The way to find out if they are in a good mood, and if it is the right time to talk with them, is simply by asking. Remember to keep calm.

Here the author switches from "are in good moods" to the more common "are in a good mood," when the discussion shifts from theoretical and general to hypothetical and specific, suggesting that her commitment to "they are in good moods" is less than a wholehearted.

The great majority of the matches are from 2000 or later, starting with Spencer Rathus, Psychology: The Core (2000):

THE HELPER: WHO HELPS? Many factors affect helping behavior:

  1. Empathic observers who are in good moods are more likely to help. Most psychologists focus on the roles of a helper's mood and personality traits. By and large, we are more likely to help others when we are in a good mood (Baron & Byrne, 1997). Perhaps good moods impart a sense of personal power. People who are empathic are also more likely to help people in need (Darley, 1993).

Here, again, "are in good moods" rapidly and unconsciously gives way to "are in a good mood" when the subject shifts from "Empathic observers who" to "we."

Use of 'are in a good mood'

In contrast to the 43 matches it finds for "are in good moods," a Google search over the same period for "are in a good mood" yields 135 matches—meaning that the singular form "a good mood" with are in is about three times as common in the search results as the plural form "good moods" with are in. This form also goes much farther back, with a first occurrence from Robert Wodrow, The History of the Sufferings of the Church of Scotland, from the Restauration to the Revolution, volume 2 (1722):

March 11 [1684]. the Justices and Advocate are in a good Mood. Anent the criminal Process in Dependence, against Sir William Lockhart of Carstairs, Mr. Hugh Maxwel of Dalswintoun, (who, towards the End of this Year, got not so well off) John Campbel of Horsecleugh, James Campbel of Greenock-mains, and about Eighty Country People, who are present, the Advocate declares his Majesty hath ordered the Dirt to be deserted against them ; and the Lords desert it simpliciter.

The same idiomatic form appears almost 300 years later in, for example, Barry Babin & Eric Harris, CB 7 (2015):

As a result, retailers should prefer that consumers shop in their stores when they are in a good mood. Many cues can make a consumer's mood more positive, including music, smells, and even exposure to lucky numbers!

This appears to be, by a significant margin, the more common way of referring to the good mood(s) of multiple people, though "are in good moods" is not exactly rare.

Emergence of 'in a good mood' as a common expression

The rise of "in a good mood" (red line) as a common idiomatic expression is chiefly a twentieth-century phenomenon, as this Ngram chart for the years 1710–2005 reflects:

In contrast the wording "in good moods" (blue line) is far less frequent. The much greater frequency of "in a good mood" may act against any natural inclination to attribute being "in good moods" to multiple individuals that may each be in a different (but good) mood.

  • All that effort and this answer doesn't even rate a single upvote? Shameful. +1, Sven, and great work - only wish I could vote more than once.
    – user98990
    Commented Jun 17, 2015 at 2:36

In a good mood is the correct way to say it.

Let's say you're referring to one person (singular): "I'm in a good mood."

Now you and another individual: "We're in a good mood."

Now two other individuals: "They're in a good mood."

The amount of people affects the pronoun, not the word 'mood' itself. So if you're referring to both of your dogs you'd say "they're in a good mood"—the pronoun they is what represents both of them.

  • cool, thanks. the reason i was looking for is that "in a good mood" is a fixed expression and therefore does not inflect, as @EdwinAshworth stated above. but i'll accept this!
    – abcd
    Commented Jun 5, 2015 at 22:19
  • note that because "in a good mood" is a fixed expression, the logical reasoning i included in my question -- i.e., how many moods are really present? -- is irrelevant to the resolution of this grammatical issue.
    – abcd
    Commented Jun 5, 2015 at 22:24
  • 1
    user124221 - the quality of your answer would be significantly improved if you edited-in your comment. Congratulations on your first accepted answer! :-)
    – user98990
    Commented Jun 5, 2015 at 22:38
  • @LittleEva thank you for the heads up. I'm new here so I have much to learn.
    – user124221
    Commented Jun 5, 2015 at 22:41
  • That is what makes EL&U so captivating. Enjoy yourself. BTW, study "good" answers and emulate. If you click on 'edit' below one of those good answers it will open up and you can review the formatting - being careful not to inadvertently alter anything, then save the edit (that you didn't make).
    – user98990
    Commented Jun 5, 2015 at 22:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.