I'm having trouble understanding this sentence from a book on system theory, which reads like a modern version of Euclid's Elements:
Intuitively, we would expect the concept of a system to involve some kind of inter-relation between the percepts it generates, and which then become identified with corresponding relationships between the external qualities which generated them.
The idiomatic construction would be "inter-relation between x
and y
" but the meaning of "inter-relation between the percepts" seems to be "a set of relations among a set of percepts" because there is no noun y
to follow. Here is my attempt at a paraphrase, with parentheses to identify nouns:
The concept of a system involves
(a set S of
(relations among
(a set of
(percepts generated by the system))))
such that S becomes "identified with"
(a set of
(relations among
(a set of
(external qualities generated the percepts)))).
Does this seem right?