I am trying to help my girlfriend study english.

She was wondering why use "of" in the following sentence:

The Chinese self-image is still in so many ways, of a weak country.

Is it simply a more formal way of describing something which must be learned by rote, or is there a grammar rule I can explain to clarify it?

  • There is nothing unusual at all about the of in the sentence. Try to read it simplified by dropping the parenthetical: "The Chinese self-image is still (that) of a weak country" -- that can and usually is omitted where it is safe to do so.
    – Kris
    May 27, 2015 at 15:11
  • Please also visit English Language Learners
    – Kris
    May 27, 2015 at 15:12

2 Answers 2


An image is not a country, which is what you say if you omit of:

The Chinese self-image is . . . a weak country.

We ordinarily say that we have an image (a picture) of something. In this case it's complicated by the use of self-image; the literal sense of the sentence is that

The Chinese image of themselves is [an image] of a weak country.

It would be more rational to say that

China's image of itself is [an image] of a weak country.

But this sort of conflation of the country and its people, like that of an organization and its members, is pretty standard.

  • How about using "that" ("is that of a weak...")?
    – Centaurus
    May 27, 2015 at 14:42
  • 1
    @Centaurus That would be fine; the referent of that would be an image, so it amounts to the same thing. May 27, 2015 at 14:51

"Of" indicates belonging. So in the example sentence given, the assumption is that weak countries have certain shared characteristics, and the Chinese self-image is then suggested to be from that class of shared characteristics.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.