0

This question already has an answer here:

For brevity, I symbolise (imperfect) synonymity with :  X ≈ Y  means  X and Y are synonyms.

From Merriam Webster: to say nothing of = let alone   ≈ much less ≈ still less.

I already recognise, and ask not, about each's meaning. Instead, how do the 2 words in each phrase combine to introduce something as being even less likely than something already mentioned?

marked as duplicate by Chenmunka, Tim Lymington supports Monica, Mr. Shiny and New 安宇, anongoodnurse, Tushar Raj Jun 4 '15 at 17:37

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • @HotLicks They aren't duplicates. Please see my edit. – Greek - Area 51 Proposal May 27 '15 at 2:46
  • They don't really combine that way. Read "Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone" to get probly the fullest and clearest discussion of how such meanings work out. – John Lawler May 27 '15 at 3:23
  • @JohnLawler Thanks. I shall. Sorry if you had to repeat your answer here; I thought that the article only regarded 'let alone'. – Greek - Area 51 Proposal May 27 '15 at 3:31
  • 3
    It does. But the answer to all of your etymological questions is "Some people used it that way". Not everything that people say or do makes sense, you know. Get used to not understanding everything. – John Lawler May 27 '15 at 3:34
  • "Let alone" (in the "not to mention" usage) seems easy to understand. It means "even setting aside". – Hot Licks May 27 '15 at 11:09
1

You are right, the expression has its secrets and can 't be understood logically. Etymonline only says: "let alone" meaning not to mention is from 1812. No hint that it is difficult to see how these two words acquired their special meaning. I have never thought about this problem before, but this post makes clear that we have an etymological problem.

I doubt that we may find an explanation in etymological dictionaries as such fixed sayings easily slip through the net. But it might be that on the Internet someone somewhere has raised this question before.

Longman's DCE (let, no.14): let alone, used after a negative statement to say that the next thing you mention is even more unlikely. - The baby can't even sit up yet, let alone walk!

From this example you can see that the formulations "not to mention" and "even less" both fit and have the same meaning.

If we wanted to try to express the idea of "not to mention" with "let" one might say: The baby can't even sit up yet. Let us not talk of walking.

The saying "Let me alone! has the meaning "Don't bother me!, Keep away from me!" So one might guess the meaning of "let alone walk" might be said in the sense of: And I don't want to touch the subject of walking. That's a thing that is still far away.

I think that some native speaker can explain our etymological problem better than I, it is my first attempt.

Added: I should add that in my view "let" is no imperative, but a past participle.

Added: 2. Not to mention, as in We have no room for another house guest, let alone an entire family. [c. 1800] I've just found this example of The Free Dictionary, taken from AHD, American Heritage Dictionary. They say: from around 1800. So it might be that "let alone" meaning not to mention came up in America,

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.