4

I intend to describe something possible to be held by hand.

I want to use the word in this fragment:

Flat 3-dimensions and grabbable 2-dimensions.

I'm trying to express in my paper that the dimension seems to be reversed because of the dominance of smartphones. Basically, a plane cannot be held by our hand. But because we have become so familiar with LCD monitors - even more than external reality - I think we understand virtual reality as 'flat 3-dimension' and reality as 'grabbable plane'.

I've found words like 'holdable', 'grippable', 'grabbable' and 'graspable' but I'm not sure which one would be best.

  • Have you consulted a dictionary to examine the meanings of the adjectives you are considering? – Marv Mills May 22 '15 at 9:39
  • You can (in the 'are not forbidden by some notional Academie' sense) use any word. Or even any non-word. You claim that 'grabbable' is a word. But you offer no evidence to support this. You might check (under 'grab') in Random House Kernerman Webster's College Dictionary, © 2010 K Dictionaries Ltd. // I'm not happy with your intended metaphorical usage; it confuses me rather than helps my understanding. – Edwin Ashworth May 22 '15 at 9:40
  • Are you really after 'concrete'? – Edwin Ashworth May 22 '15 at 9:48
  • 1
    I think that in the context you describe, 'grabbable' works just fine if you are implying that you can grab hold of a virtual plane and manipulate it, move it out of the way etc. – Erik Kowal May 22 '15 at 10:04
  • 1
    Are you trying to say that something virtual, untouchable appears to be real, as if you could touch it? Tangible might be a word that fits. – Lucky May 22 '15 at 10:24
1

I think you're looking for "handheld".

handheld

: designed to be used while being held in your hands

Merriam-Webster reference

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.