"Herpivory"? "Ranophagy"? Hurry, I need to mock a French friend.

  • The OALD says that Frog is an offensive word for French people... Why eating a frog? – Alenanno May 10 '11 at 23:33
  • mocking is against the rules here!! (only joking =) have fun!) – l0Ft May 11 '11 at 5:31

I guess I should know !!!

You could create some neologism such as
- amphibiophagy ( ἀμφίβιος => both lives + φαγεῖν => to eat)
- batrachiophagy ( βάτραχος => frog + φαγεῖν => to eat)
- anuraphagy ( αν => without + ουρά => tail + φαγεῖν => to eat) credits @Malvolio.

  • 1
    anuraphagy? – Malvolio May 10 '11 at 23:42
  • @Malvolio, yes this is nice as well. – Alain Pannetier Φ May 10 '11 at 23:50
  • 9
    If you'll only eat true frogs, you're a batrachiophage; if you'll down a toad or two as well, you're an anuraphage; if you'll even dine upon newts and salanders, you're an amphibiophage. Bon appetit. – Malvolio May 11 '11 at 1:31
  • 2
    +1 for batrachiophagy, as in "βατραχομυομαχία". But are you certain about the translitteration of χ with “chi” even if it's followed by “o”? I'd go with batraco-, but I'm not an expert. – Agos May 11 '11 at 8:46
  • 3
    @Agos: if it's coined in a classical manner from the Greek roots it should be batrachophagy. But since the form of "batrach-" most familiar to people is the family name Batrachia, "batrachiophagy" is a natural coinage. – Colin Fine May 11 '11 at 11:36

I guess that would be a ranaphagy, from family Ranidae (true frogs), most of the edible ones being genus Rana.

I think calling him a ranophage sounds better though.

Here's a link mentioning edibility of a couple of species. It ain't just the Frogs wot eat frogs. Apparently them damned Yankees eat even more! (or maybe I should say 'damned Confederacy Southerners')

  • rana is a Latin word, phagy comes from Greek. I tried not to mix up. – Alain Pannetier Φ May 10 '11 at 23:49
  • @Alain Pannetier: If I'm to be criticised, at least I'll know it was from an expert! I didn't even know (or check). But I seem to recall that such lexical chimeras are not without precedent. Anyway, just to drive home the advantage, I'll also mention that the question is tongue-in-cheek to start with. Besides, if @Malvolio's French pal posts here asking how to answer the taunt, you'll be a shoo-in Top Answer for a withering riposte! – FumbleFingers May 11 '11 at 0:04
  • 1
    @Alain Pannetier: I hope I've noticed you enough on EL&U to know you're unlikely to be rude. I on the other hand am prone to appear so, unintentionally. And sometimes I actually do get tetchy. I suppose ranavore really should be the definitive answer. But -phage to me suggests more primitive life-forms like bacteriophages, whereas even humans are omnivores. If you're gonna insult the guy, talk him right down the food chain! – FumbleFingers May 11 '11 at 0:26
  • 1
    @Agos: not to mention 'automobile'. – Colin Fine May 11 '11 at 11:37
  • 1
    @Colin Fine: I think cars are really Erinacevores (hedgehog eaters). But that's only because I don't know of a Latin suffix for "flattener". – FumbleFingers May 11 '11 at 14:12

protected by tchrist Jul 6 '14 at 23:52

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.