I've just got wondering if this sentence is grammatically correct:

You are who I love.

This is what I am thinking:

Let's focus on the who clause, then you can find that the missing element from this clause is actually an object after the verb love. Therefore, who should be changed to whom, which is an object relative pronoun.

  • You are whom I love.

Now, the whom clause has no problem, but you can see that whom clause works as an object. However, there is the place at which a subject complement should be. So, I should either change the whom clause back to a who clause or make you into an object.

  1. You is whom I love.
  2. It's you whom I love.
  3. Whom I love is you.

After all that, I came this far with these three sentences and I think the most appropriate sentence is the second one, but I'm not sure if my assumption is right; the way I fixed the sentence, is it right?

  • 1
    1 and 3 are ungrammatical. 2 is grammatical, but it's not a "fix" either, merely a rewording. Any sentence at all can be reworded. Language is flexible like that. There's many ways to skin a cat. There are many ways to skin a cat. There's more than one way to skin a cat. – RegDwigнt May 19 '15 at 9:40
  • 1
    The most appropriate sentences are 4. I love you. or 5. You're the one I love. These avoid the need for the largely obsolescent 'whom' (though (2) is just about bearable; however, more idiomatic would be It's you that I love.). It's you I love. is another workaround. – Edwin Ashworth May 19 '15 at 9:41
  • 2
    Also, I think "you are whom I love" is actually more likely than "you are who I love", though for reasons of articulation (Sandhi) rather than grammar. – RegDwigнt May 19 '15 at 9:42
  • I don't understand your sentence However, there is the place at which a subject complement should be. Can you explain what you mean, please :) – Araucaria - Not here any more. May 19 '15 at 10:20
  • 1
    @Araucaria Thanks. I've just found it here, http://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/subject-complements. – hjjg200 May 19 '15 at 12:29

The original is probably eliding a word.

I think this works:

You are she whom I love.

'are' is a linking verb here; 'whom' is introducing an appositive phrase and is the object of 'love'. What's missing in the original is the predicate pronoun ('she', 'he', etc.).

| improve this answer | |
  • Sounds stilted to me. The form whom is stilted, unless it immediately follows a preposition. – Tim Osborne Apr 12 at 8:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.