Can the term modernist, when describing literary work, be in fact used to reference poetry that was, but not is, modern?

closed as off-topic by Mitch, ScotM, Centaurus, Ellie Kesselman, Kristina Lopez May 18 '15 at 19:45

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • If you are asking if modernist means with preference for war the answer is no. thefreedictionary.com/modernist – user66974 May 15 '15 at 10:48
  • No I am saying is this the correct way to describe the general conventions of poetry during a specific era, if anyone understands what i'm saying – Hedonistic May 15 '15 at 10:49
  • 1
    You mean contemporary poetry? – user66974 May 15 '15 at 10:52
  • 1
    @Josh61 Yes! That is the word I was looking for – Hedonistic May 15 '15 at 10:53

Beg pardon, but which society are you talking about? Your premise would not be true about "all" or even most British poetry in World War One. In fact, during the anniversary the other day people were saying how the great war poets like Owen were more anti-war than the average. Germans, French, Russians, Austrians and Americans, I wouldn't know. Without speaking Italian, however, I am aware of the Futurism of Marinetti & Co., which might be called a variant of Modernism. Not exactly the poetry of the war, and more about art than poetry, but one response to the cataclysm.

Anyway, a more English expression would be that the poetry was "pro-war" or "militaristic", or that it "glorified war" or "romanticised war". It's harder to do as an adjective.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.