0
  1. There's the room; not in the room is the man.

I want to replace the semicolon with a comma and make the second sentence a relative clause. Is it okay to change it as:

  1. There's the room, not in which is the man.

Surely, it's obvious that it would be perfectly grammatical to change it as:

  1. There's the room, in which the man isn't.

However, I want to kind of put some emphasis on not.
In this case, which sentence would be more acceptable or appropriate?

  • 1
    There is the room the man is not in. / There is the room the man isn't in. – Araucaria May 15 '15 at 12:09
-1

Grammatically, # 2 is fine, but stylistically, it's awkward, though whether that matters or not depends on the context in which you're using it.

-1

I think perhaps it should be

There's the room; the man is not in the room.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.