(1) I am here. [linking verb or not?]

(2) I remain here. [linking verb or not?]

(3) I stay here. [linking verb or not?]

(1') I am angry. [linking verb]

(2') I remain angry. [linking verb]

(3') I stay angry. [linking verb]

In the latter three, "am", "remain" and "stay" are all linking verbs.

How about those verbs in the former three?

Are they linking verbs as in the latter three or are they not?


(In response to Adam's answer)

In Oxford Learner's Dictionaries, "remain" is shown to have four distinct meanings, the last of which is as follows

4 [intransitive] + adv./prep. to stay in the same place; to not leave

They remained in Mexico until June.

The plane remained on the ground.

She left, but I remained behind.

All three "remained" in the example sentences here are replaceable with "was/were", but the dictionary doesn't categorize this kind of "remain" as a linking verb, given that the first meaning of the four is listed as a linking verb.


If "am" in "I am here" is a linking verb, then why is it not possible to say "I become here" or "I seem here". I mean, if "am" is a linking verb, shouldn't it be replaceable with another linking verb?

  • Answer to question in last Edit: No, because "linking verbs" are not freely substitutable. In the right context, one can construct equivalent sentences for practically any pair, but that's not unusual if the context is specific enough. "Linking verb" is a fiction meant to keep children from asking questions the teacher isn't clear on. Dec 8, 2016 at 16:11

2 Answers 2


I think the problem is that "Linking Verb" is not defined precisely enough.

All the discussion so far has simply presupposed that there is such a category, and presumed that there was a good definition of it. Somewhere. But nobody's got one that works well enough, so far. Perhaps there isn't one.

"Linking verb" is a sort of translation of the Latin copula 'coupling', which referred to the Latin verb sum, esse, fūī, futūrus 'be'. Everyone agrees that be is an English linking verb. But are there others?

Well, a replacement test won't work. Be is far too idiomatic for substituting it to prove anything.

The suggestion has been made that a linking verb connects the subject to some constituent after the verb, but exactly what kind of constituent, and what kind of connection is made, are not specified.

There are a lot of different kinds of phenomena (constructions and rules, for instance) that connect one part of a sentence with another. Verbs connect noun phrases (like the subject), and other kinds of phrases, depending on the meaning of the verb.

Verbs that can often cause confusion are Locatives, like stand, lie, remain, and fall, as in

  • At the top of the stairs stands a grandfather clock.
  • The professor's grave lies next to his mother's.
  • A lonely mesa rises east of Albuquerque.
  • He remained at the wheel for three hours.
  • A boundary falls on his property.

Other verbs that can cause confusion are the Aspectual verbs, like start, finish, stop, continue, and remain. Note that remain belongs to both classes; they are not disjoint. Language mostly doesn't have neat boundaries.

  • He started/stopped being depressed around November.
  • He continued being depressed all year.
  • He remained depressed all year.

They take various complement types -- being is required with a predicate adjective for complements of continue, but it's forbidden for remain -- but they're complements, not adjuncts. Aspectual verbs have very little independent meaning; they're close to, but not quite, real auxiliary verbs like be. That's probly why they cause the trouble.

The definition of a grammar school term like "linking verb" (which is taught to children instead of "auxiliary verb" because auxiliary is too big a word) is vague on purpose. It's for children, so it doesn't need to be any more precise than the definition of "bogeyman". Your teachers very likely didn't understand it, anyway, because they'd been taught by teachers who didn't, either, and they, in turn, were also.


Linking verbs connect the subject to additional info describing the subject (state of being, quality, etc.). As a quick pointer, all forms of be are always linking verbs. (source)

  1. I am here. (linking—am is a form of be)
  2. I remain here. (linking—remain describes the temporal aspect of where you are)
  3. I stay here. (linking—stay also describes the temporal aspect of where you are)

Referencing the source again, if you can replace the verb with am, are, or is and the sentence still makes sense, it is most likely a linking verb.

In your last question, become and seem are, interestingly enough, linking verbs as well. Although here doesn't fit in these cases, the verbs are still linking.

  • Please read the 'edit' and let me know if you think the dictionary is wrong or that it turns out not as simply as you seem to suggest it is.
    – JK2
    May 14, 2015 at 6:20
  • @JK2 I have edited my answer. It seems I rushed through it too quickly. Your edits are correct.
    – Adam
    May 14, 2015 at 6:30
  • I'm not sure how reliable your "continuous aspect test" could be, given that you actually can say "I'm being stupid" (when 'am' is a linking verb in "I'm stupid").
    – JK2
    May 14, 2015 at 6:56
  • Anyways, please read my second edit, and let me know what you think.
    – JK2
    May 14, 2015 at 7:00
  • 1
    "I live here": not a linking verb. "I am here": the sentence makes sense. "I write fast": not a linking verb. "I am fast": the sentence makes sense. I don't think that's a very useful criterion. Aug 12, 2015 at 12:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.