What does it mean when someone says he has an agenda? Is there a negative connotation to agenda? If there is, then why and what is a word that means the same thing but has a positive connotation?

  • 1
    If someone is actually running a meeting, then he has an agenda does not have a negative meaning. (The literal meaning of agenda being a list of things to discuss at a meeting.) Jan 26, 2012 at 13:49

4 Answers 4


Yes, in this use it has a negative connotation. This use may have come from the longer expression "hidden agenda" (which effectively means "hidden purpose", "hidden thought behind doing something").

If you want a more positive connotation, then you could simply say: "He has a plan", "He has a proposal"...

  • 1
    I disagree that the word itself causes this to come across negatively; like many other words or phrases, it depends on the context and is projected by intonation; for example, 'thanks a bunch!' either being sarcastic or sincere doesn't depend on the words used. May 7, 2011 at 10:26
  • 2
    I agree with @Mr. Disappointment. For instance you can speak of the political agenda of a party meaning the list of policies to be pursued or political issues to be addressed (source: OED). Of course hidden agenda has mostly a negative meaning but, again, one's agenda may be hidden but not necessarily evil.
    – nico
    May 7, 2011 at 10:45
  • 3
    To me, "He has an agenda" seems to intrinsically have more of a negative connotation than "He has a plan" or "He has an idea" or "He has a direction" etc, just as "He has a vision" seems to have an intrinsically positive connotation. I'm not convinced it's JUST about the intonation of a construction that could be filled with any word and have equal connotations. May 8, 2011 at 10:55
  • It's not about intonation in this case, it's about context. To "have an agenda" is a negative thing. The word "agenda" by itself has no positive or negative connotations.
    – jackgill
    Jun 26, 2011 at 16:09
  • An individual having an agenda indicates a preconceived desire for a specific outcome. In this usage, the negative connotation comes from the perception of bias and therefore a lack of trust in the individual's decision-making pertaining to the issue at hand.
    – GBorreson
    May 31, 2017 at 22:03

Normally, a meeting has ONE AGENDA so that the meeting's flow will go smoothly - if someone, as Neil Coffey points out, has a "hidden agenda" or another agenda then you can expect that the meeting will not go smoothly.


I came in with the express purpose of checking out whether to have an agenda has a negative connotation or not – as such it was in the back of my mind. The fact that there is a relevant discussion here means that this idiom has in fact developed towards this connotation. As far as I'm concerned, the answer is: yes, it can have an inherent negative meaning: "John came all the way from California to see Mr. Psmith. And he had an agenda".


I'd add my viewpoint as follows:

When a person "has an agenda", I perceive it mostly as negative, whether its intent is meant to be against something positive or not. This is because it is the agenda of one individual. Individual agendas also rarely adapt, so if evidence started saying it needed to, it would mostly not. The connotation is usually about hidden agendas (i.e. he has an agenda, but it hasn't been revealed.)

When an organization "has an agenda", I perceive it mostly negative, but not as much so. If the agenda is revealed, then it is neutral to positive. Mostly when this statement is made, it is for a hidden agenda. Organizations though are more likely to adapt their agendas.

If it is an event that "has an agenda", I think the connotation is entirely positive. the conference or meeting "has an agenda". Whether you know it or not, is less important now, because the one thing you know you need for events is structure.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.