1

If one is referencing a prior comment in a conversation that uses a term with multiple meanings, using the alternate meaning to make wordplay, would this be considered a pun? (Note: poor software engineering joke to follow)

Person 1: "It's a stomach bug"

Person 2: "You should probably check the log file."

For some explicit context, bug was intended to reference a germ/sickness, whereas the following line references "bug" in terms of an issue with software - and checking a log file is a common way to solve the issue.

Person 1 did not intend to make a pun, but Person 2 explicitly exposed the dual meaning. Both parties are aware of the word's other meaning.

Should this be considered a pun? If not, is there a more appropriate and specific term for this?

  • 2
    Log also has a relevant (though indelicate) meaning. – TimLymington Apr 23 '15 at 19:20
  • 3
    It would be funnier if Person 2 said "You should probably check your logs" – Frank Apr 23 '15 at 19:21
  • See also double entendre en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_entendre which doesn't require Person 1 to be aware of the alternate meaning. And Donald McGill's seaside postcards en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_McGill – Frank Apr 23 '15 at 19:27
  • @Frank Agreed on the revision :P Though assume for the above that Person 1 is aware of the alternate meaning (and it is relevant to the conversation's context, as well) – ty1824 Apr 23 '15 at 19:30
2

I see no reason not to say that person 2 has made a pun. One would say that he has punned off Person 1 or his straight line. Puns by no means have to be self-contained, in isolation, indeed the most fun is to be had with a punning contest or at the least with a good rally (using this in the tennis sense).

1

Not at all. Sometimes the words are not explicitly used at all..

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.