Can anyone please explain the difference between words: moraliser and moralist? Which one has got more positive meaning? Which one would be more appropriate, for example, in such a sentence: Charles Dickens was a great moraliser/moralist.


Both have negative connotations:

mor‧al‧ize also moralise

British English [intransitive]

to tell other people your ideas about right and wrong behaviour, especially when they have not asked for your opinion [= preach]:


And I am sure the above isn't only BrE, but also AmE.

Now about the other. See 3:

mor·al·ist noun

1 : one who leads a moral life

2 : a teacher or student of morals : a thinker or writer concerned with moral principles and problems

3 : one who is concerned to regulate the morals of others

Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary

However, I feel that the first has more of this negative connotation.

  • I thought so. A moraliser seems to be an intrusive preacher giving you a sermon when you don't ask for. Thanks. – ernest58 Apr 20 '15 at 22:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.