This is my first time here, and I am hoping this community can help me out.

The context is as follows:

I witnessed a slow transition from awareness and excitement to Wallace's "natural state" - irritability, discontent, and a lack of listening skills.

Could anyone recommend a single word, or perhaps a better wording, for the bold text?



| improve this question | | | | |

Words like inattentive, distracted, distrait, oblivious come to mind.

Since lack of listening skills as a phrase is broad—there are many ways in which someone can be a poor listener—you might want to just use the phrase itself.

| improve this answer | | | | |
  • 1
    "Inattentive" and "distrait" are both fantastic. Thank you! – David Baylies Apr 20 '15 at 19:27

I witnessed a slow transition from awareness and excitement to Wallace's "natural state" - irritable†, discontent, and inattentive‡.

†Note: you may want to change irritability to irritable. Irritability is a noun that is a state of being, while irritable is an adjective that describes a noun's referent; in this case: Wallace's "natural state."

Inattentive (adj.)

  1. Of or pertaining to lack of attention; not paying attention; careless.

He was inattentive in class and did not do well in his exams.


Ignorant (adj.)

  1. Unknowledgeable or uneducated; characterized by ignorance.
  2. (slang) ill-mannered, crude.

Unmindful (adj.)

  1. lacking awareness; oblivious
  2. failing to remember or recognize something; heedless

Close-minded (adj.) [alternately spelled: closed-minded]

  1. unreceptive to new ideas or information; not open to any agreement.
| improve this answer | | | | |

Lack of listening skills is often due to self-absorption, in extreme cases solipsism:


1 Preoccupation with one’s own emotions, interests, or situation:


1.1 The quality of being self-centred or selfish.


| improve this answer | | | | |
  • That's helpful, although solipsism would be taking it a bit far. Thanks for the insight. – David Baylies Apr 20 '15 at 19:28
  • Sorry if I got carried away, namesake, but poor listeners are very much a bête noire of mine. – David Pugh Apr 20 '15 at 19:39
  • I think this suggestion goes too far. It attempts to explain why someone is a poor listener, which is more than a term for the fact that someone is a poor listener. – Martin Krzywinski Apr 20 '15 at 21:21
  • You're right, but please look again at the context of describing Wallace, where I submit that it would work. Also, I don't like your dictionary definition of solipsism, which I understand as a disbelief in the existence of others or an outside world for them to be in. It's more radical than mere selfishness. – David Pugh Apr 20 '15 at 21:47

If a person does not seem to understand what's being said, by either a lack of focus or an incapacity to actively listen, I would probably describe him or her as dense.

"Not exactly stupid, the person can be book smart but can also be: thick headed, clueless, lacking common sense, unable to catch onto hints"

| improve this answer | | | | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.