1

Background:

I am writing a computer application which can understand English sentence. For that purpose, I was preparing frames of each word. For example:

send something to recipient|place

Since to can be defined as separate frame;

to recipient|place

So the frame for send can be defined as

send something

Now I found a phrase;

"Send him my love"

Question

Is there any grammar rule which transforms Send my love to him into Send him my love, or it is word-specific?

send recipient something

send something to recipient

6
  • 3
    I think that English generally permits the alternative positioning "Send flowers to Algernon" and "Send Algernon flowers." It's just part of the flexibility of the language.
    – Sven Yargs
    Apr 19, 2015 at 7:51
  • 2
    It's worth noting that only a recipient can be an indirect (dative) object; a place is a destination and so cannot be treated in the same way: i.e. we can say either I sent a gift to him or I sent him a gift, but we can only say I sent a gift to his house, not *I sent his house a gift. This has its roots in some Indo-European idea that recipients belong in the dative case and destinations in the accusative; even though English has outgrown its case markings, it hasn't outgrown much of the grammar that accompanied them.
    – Anonym
    Apr 19, 2015 at 7:55
  • @Anonym, you gave me a good point. +1 Apr 19, 2015 at 9:30
  • Examples and non-examples: bring it to me = bring me it, lend it to me = lend me it, pass it to me = pass me it, give it to me = give me it, sing a song to me = sing me a song, told it to me = told me it. But also do me a favour = do a favour for me not do a favour to me, save me a piece = save a piece for me not save a piece to me .
    – Neil W
    Apr 19, 2015 at 11:43
  • 1
    See this answer on dative transformation and its comments. Yes, there is a general rule. However, there are a few dative constructions that cannot be unravelled into prepositional phrases in this way, which is what that other question is asking
    – tchrist
    Apr 19, 2015 at 12:06

1 Answer 1

1

I got to know about dative case after receiving some really helpful comments. And I found a very helpful document about dative shifting.

Explanation which exactly meets with my question;

3a John sent the parcel to Mary

3b John sent Mary the parcel

4a John sent the parcel to the States

4b * John sent the States the parcel

In both 3 and 4 the direct object, [the parcel], travels towards the indirect object, [Mary] or [the States], making it the Goal of the action. The semantic difference is that in 3 [Mary] is the Beneficiary of the action, the person for whom the parcel is intended, but in 4 [the States] has no such role. For this shift to occur it seems that we must have the right type of verb and the right type of indirect object.

Frames

[sender] send (smth) (to [recipient])
[sender] send ([recipient] smth)    ;where recipient is a beneficiary.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.