I saw the word admixture used in a sentence recently and looked it up in the Paperback Oxford English Dictionary only to find that its definition is "a mixture".

This is the sentence:

The 'Natura' section features a series of sixteen prose poems, redolent in many ways of Hill's Mercian Hymns in their admixtures of natural and urban landscape, dramatised autobiography and historical reference, fomal and colloquial styles.

Why is "admixtures" used here rather than "mixture"?

  • 8
    I don't think your example turns on the distinction between mixture and admixture at all - it's just the kind of pretentious writing that's all too common in Lit Crit contexts. And I must say I find this particular use of redolent equally inappropriate. If the writer really wanted a 50-cent word there, reminiscent would be better - the target of "redolent" is more usually something which is directly perceived through the senses (particularly, obviously, olfactory), rather than just another indirection through "evocative" music/poetry/artwork. Apr 17, 2015 at 17:09
  • Admixture is rare compared to mixture; I would personally never use it, even in formal writing. To my ear it carries a connotation similar to adulterated, i.e. "some elements of the overall mixture shouldn't have been added", but I don't think that is what was meant in this quote.
    – zwol
    Apr 17, 2015 at 17:56
  • 1
    @FumbleFingers (dropping the sledgehammer)
    – tylerharms
    Apr 17, 2015 at 19:50
  • 3
    @tylerharms: As a "Literary Studies" graduate myself, I'm sure I've been as guilty as the next man of this sort of thing. And doubtless once in a blue moon an obscure word choice really does carry some subtle significance that passes me by. But I suspect admixture here is just a somewhat clumsy way of trying to emphasise the judicious, artistic "mixing" - pluralised to add even more emphasis through "unusual word choice". Most likely because the writer didn't actually think of the far more precise term juxtaposition. Apr 17, 2015 at 20:30

4 Answers 4


Admixture is a minor ingredient, a smaller part of mixture, added to mixture

Mixture is irrelevant of ingredients proportions, and is one whole mixture.

In your quote, the author wants to stress that every single component that was added, plays its role in the final impression. To make such an emphasis, 'admixture' works better.

Technical example from Federal Highway Administration: (I am giving a technical context because in this case 'admixture' is the only acceptable term, and is absolutely different from 'mixture')

Chemical Admixtures

Chemical admixtures are added to concrete in very small amounts mainly for the entrainment of air, reduction of water or cement content, plasticization of fresh concrete mixtures, or control of setting time.

Seven types of chemical admixtures are specified in ASTM C 494, and AASHTO M 194, depending on their purpose or purposes in PCC. Air entraining admixtures are specified in ASTM C 260 and AASHTO M 154. General and physical requirements for each type of admixture are included in the specifications.


An article on Yourdictionary.com packed with lots of other context examples (follow the link).

Most dictionaries do not explain the difference, I found only two that mention that admixture as 'a minor ingredient':

The Oxford Pocket Dictionary of Current English (2009)

ad·mix·ture / adˈmikschər/ something mixed with something else,

  • typically is a minor ingredient.

  • the action of adding such an ingredient.

Collins dictionary article is good for giving synonyms and clearly splits admixture in two meanings, 'mixture' and 'component':



  • mixture, combination, compound, blend, fusion, alloy, medley, amalgamation, meld, intermixture
    • His heart beat with an admixture of aversion and thrill.
  • ingredient, element, component, constituent

Example from the question: (mixture or admixture)

The 'Natura' section features a series of sixteen prose poems, redolent in many ways of Hill's Mercian Hymns in their admixtures of natural and urban landscape, dramatised autobiography and historical reference, fomal and colloquial styles.

In this case replacing 'admixtures' with 'mixtures' would not be a grammar mistake but it would shift the emphases. The author refers to different components of the Mercian Hymns, and enumerates them. But, if 'mixtures' were used, the emphasis would shift towards hymns themselves rather than components. The description would become less poetic.

  • This is a great, clear, and direct answer. +1. Would you mind editing in some references to dictionaries?
    – Dan Bron
    Apr 17, 2015 at 16:15
  • Could you give an example sentence of its appropriate use? I don't follow your explanation.
    – camden_kid
    Apr 17, 2015 at 16:22
  • @Dan Bron - That's done, thank you for suggestion.
    – Oleksii
    Apr 17, 2015 at 17:03
  • @camden_kid Examples added
    – Oleksii
    Apr 17, 2015 at 17:04
  • @javaNoobs Would it be incorrect to use the word 'mixture' in the sentence in my question? If so, does that mean 'admixture' is not used correctly in that sentence? I guess this is what is confusing me.
    – camden_kid
    Apr 17, 2015 at 19:19

The point is about adding to mixture elements that are alien to some extent to the majority or to each other. As you can see, that collection of poems is a bit strange in their eclecticness:-). See the last example in the dictionary definition.

Let me give you the official separation first as per the mother of all synonym dictionaries:

Admixture adds to mixture the suggestion of the alien character of one or more of the constituent elements

Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Synonyms: A Dictionary of Discriminated ...

Then, lemme give you the whole/real shebang of a definition :-)



1 a : the act of mixing

a favorable result will be obtained only by careful admixture of ingredients

b : the fact of being mixed

repeated sifting is necessary to secure complete admixture

2 a : an element or substance added by mixing

comic verses with an occasional admixture of mild bawdry — Alexander Cowie

b : a substance other than cement, aggregate, or water that is mixed with concrete

3 : a product of mixing:

a : a compound formed by mixing

by using wool, silk, cotton, and linen fibers in various admixtures — A. C. Morrison

b : something formed by combining two or more things

The presiding spirit of this place—an admixture of fear and what passes for hope among chronic gamblers—can be found in the basement beneath the grandstand … — David Samuels, Harper’s, February 1999

Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary


Affirming and expanding upon the good answer of javaNoobs:

  1. Mixture is a more general term with broader application than admixture:


1.0 A substance made by mixing other substances together:
form the mixture into a manageable dough

1.1 [MASS NOUN] The process of mixing or being mixed.

1.2 A combination of different things in which the component elements are individually distinct:
the old town is a mixture of narrow medieval streets and 18th-century architecture

1.3 Chemistry The product of the random distribution of one substance through another without any chemical reaction, as distinct from a compound.

1.4 The charge of gas or vapour mixed with air which is admitted to the cylinder of an internal-combustion engine, especially as regards the ratio of fuel to air:

  1. Admixture shares some of the definitions of mixture, and in may cases is an acceptable synonym:


1.0 A mixture:
he felt that his work was an admixture of aggression and creativity

[Entry 1.1 omitted for consideration below]

1.2 [MASS NOUN] The action of adding an ingredient to something else.

  1. Entry 1.1 in the ODO is unique to admixture:

1.1 Something mixed with something else:
green with an admixture of black

The prefix ad carries admixture toward the definition of additive in some contexts:


A substance added to something in small quantities to improve or preserve it:

Mixture is not generally used to describe an added ingredient in that way.



You guys (all people regardless of gender) are much more intelligent than I am but I think I can help from reading this word in context a variety of times.

The word admixture is different than either "lesser ingredient" or "mixture" but more like "lesser mixture" when referring to the "entire mixture". It is more like a sub-level mixture regarding a whole mixture.

Like in genealogy and culture, YOU are the mixture we are talking about and your parents, grandparents, etc are all the admixtures that YOU are comprised of.

Such as if we were talking about YOUR MOM (that's right I brought moms into this) then she would be the mixture and your grandparents, etc would all be her admixtures.

The word admixture is literally used to refer to the ADDED MIXTURES that comprise the END RESULT MIXTURE.

Don't compare this with individual ingredients. An ingredient is singular in nature (ie salt or sugar) but combining salt & sugar together creates a mixture. Thus, adding the mixture of salt & sugar to another mixture creates a new mixture with sub-level mixtures being the components aka admixtures.

So in reference to the above excerpt it is referring to mixing several independent mixtures of cultures & atmospheres to create a brand new mixed culture & atmosphere.

I would argue that the word admixture will ONLY work here and is being used properly. And the word mixture absolutely does not work here. Because the focus is on the individual mixtures that create the whole mixture while retaining the reference to the topic of the whole mixture.

Thats my take on it anyways

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.