0

Does "hungry for X" have different connotations than "thirsty for X"?

I did a few Google searches and found that "hungry for X" outdoes "thirsty for X" by about 250% with most values I tried for X.

On the other hand, "Thirst for knowledge" beats "Hunger for knowledge"; but "Thirsty for knowledge" loses to "Hungry for knowledge."

If you had to choose between the two phrases, what would you consider?

Perhaps thirst is more related to need, and hunger to desire?

closed as primarily opinion-based by Robusto, Misti, ScotM, anongoodnurse, Ellie Kesselman Apr 20 '15 at 1:24

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • It would really depend on what X is, specifically. There are shades and nuances to the two constructions. And, as you said, certain formations have historical popularity which may influence the final decision. – Dan Bron Apr 14 '15 at 14:30
  • There is no significant difference in the metaphorical implications. It's just a question of which one seems to fit from the standpoint of the thing being sought and from the standpoint of the rhythm of the words. – Hot Licks Apr 16 '15 at 2:09
2

As Dan Bron observes in a comment above, the preference for "hungry for X" over "thirsty for X" depends greatly on the identity of X. Here is an Ngram chart of books in the Google Books database across the years 1800–2000 for "hungry for knowledge" (blue line versus "thirsty for knowledge" (red line) versus "hungering for knowledge" (green line) versus "thirsting for knowledge" (yellow line) shows nothing like a 250% preference for "hungry" over "thirsty":

On the other hand, if we rerun the Ngram chart with love in place of knowledge, we get a very different-looking chart:

And if we replace love with life, we get a third chart, whose results fall somewhere in between the other two:

Despite any reinforcement that these first three chart might give to such a theory, I am skeptical that a division based on "need" versus "desire" as a guide to choosing between "hungry" and "thirsty" could withstand serious scrutiny. For example, consider what happens when we replace life with information (surely a closer match to knowledge than either life or love is):

Although the four charts presented above show varying margins of preference for "hungry for" in recent years, they also show that "thirsty for," "thirsting for," and "hungering for" remain in use at a significant level. I would let the circumstances of the narrative guide me in choosing one wording or another; I would not adopt a rule that consistently preferred one wording over the others and didn't take into account the specific context.

  • Thank you for such a detailed answer, I will mark it as the answer due to the fact that you provided such colourful and detailed analysis . – Ryan Heitner Apr 16 '15 at 7:22

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.