2

In every-day language, I would say, "Give me the fifth largest pumpkin you have"; that is I would use the ordinal.

However, this feels clunky in mathematical texts, especially when reading out loud: "select the k-th largest element" or, even worse, "the k plus first/oneth largest element".

Is it fair to say/write "the k-largest element"? It seems to me that the "aspect of ordinality" is sufficiently expressed by the -st suffix in larger (or smallest, heaviest, ...), that is the superlative.

  • Note that there is a typographic dimension here, too; $k$th largest just looks weird, whereas $k$-largest (do we want/need the hyphen?) works. – Raphael Mar 23 '15 at 12:23
  • Note that MathJax doesn't work on ELU. However kth-largest is probably acceptable. You may need a hairspace between k and "th". – Andrew Leach Mar 23 '15 at 12:29
  • 1
    k-th largest is acceptable. But this is probably better answered by those in that mathematical specialty. See math.stackexchange.com – Mitch Mar 23 '15 at 12:44
  • @AndrewLeach I know, that's why I used code formatting. ;) The looks of mixing the math font (italic) with text (upright) specifically annoys me, so I'm trying to avoid that. – Raphael Mar 23 '15 at 12:49
  • 1
    I was suggesting that the better judges of acceptability would be the experts in mathematical English, rather than those here. You'd get any 'what I prefer' here as well as there equally. Use "the $k$-th largest element", not $k$ largest, that's how it is said. – Mitch Mar 23 '15 at 12:56
7

Consider this situation where you could write your request as

Give me the 5th largest sheep

or

Give me the 5 largest sheep

They obviously mean completely different things. One will result in you having a sheep, the other in you having five sheep. Hence you should stick to the kth convention.

  • Of course you pick a deliberately confusing example. The use case I have in mind is with the proper noun "element(s)" (no confusion), and all other use cases in my context I can imagine are unproblematic as well. Also, my proposal was "5-largest", not "5 largest" (I think the difference is crucial, for the reasons you state). Note furthermore that it won't be kth but k th, and I state that the mixture of fonts is one of the reason of my asking. So in all, thanks, but this does not help me. :/ – Raphael Mar 23 '15 at 16:24
  • 2
    The mixture of fonts is not mentioned in your question. In addition, the "aspect of ordinality" is not sufficiently expressed by means of the superlative, as it took me about 2 seconds to think of an example that would break your attempt at creating a new convention. Mathematicians are perfectly happy saying things like "kth" and "k-plus-oneth" simply because they are unambiguous. Mathematicians deliberately eschew ambiguity, hence I repeat that you should not try to create a new convention. Incidentally, "kth" is perfectly fine too, as far as the mathematician in me is concerned. – Phil M Jones Mar 23 '15 at 16:37
  • 2
    Another option is to use "n" instead of "*k"", as you will find that "nth" is well used, and even documented in English dictionaries, as well as mathematical glossaries. – Phil M Jones Mar 23 '15 at 16:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.