I am writing an essay about (among other things) Gutenberg's printing press and Project Gutenberg. I want to say something along the lines of "Gutenberg's press was so popular that current things are named after him." I tried the following. Am I using namesake correctly?

As evidenced ahead, Gutenberg’s invention was so popular that he is still a popular namesake.

I want to keep namesake in there because I think it sounds cool.


From the wikipedia page it appears that your usage is a bit off. But you can keep it in there with a small modification:

As evidenced ahead, Gutenberg’s invention was so popular it is still common to see his namesake.

  • Namesake is normally used for another person. eg. "Bush's presidency reminded us of his namesake Washington." Eponymous would be better - as in Tim's answer – mgb May 2 '11 at 15:02

You might like to use 'eponym' though strictly that refers to the use of a name as a word: 'Project Gutenberg is named after the eponymous printer'. Still pretty cool.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.