12

I was about to write the following sentence:

I actually have some young seedlings of this species. It will be interesting to compare them to their older ...?

Is there a word for something that belongs to the same species? I am thinking something like "fellow X" but I don't want to name X, and I'm not sure just "fellow" will work.

2
  • 3
    Comspeciot, of course. ;-p Mar 14, 2015 at 22:35
  • It doesn't fit the analogy, but I would usually use "siblings" in this kind of comparison.
    – Austin
    Mar 16, 2015 at 1:08

4 Answers 4

28

The word is conspecific. It is used both as an adjective and a noun*; and you can use as a noun in your example.

Two or more individual organisms, populations, or taxa are conspecific if they belong to the same species.

[Wikipedia / Biological Specificity]

Etymology of the word:

1859, from conspecies (1837), from con- "with" + specific, here representing species (n.). From 1962 as a noun.

[Etymonline]

1
  • 2
    Google Books results with "older conspecifics": google.ca/…
    – ermanen
    Mar 14, 2015 at 22:41
8

I would use the word specimen.

Google defines specimen as:

an individual animal, plant, piece of a mineral, etc., used as an example of its species or type for scientific study or display.

Your example would be:

I actually have some young seedlings of this species. It will be interesting to compare them to the older specimens.

2
  • 6
    I think "specimen" is to "species" as "citizen" is to "country". Doesn't imply belonging to the same species or country, although I agree context may eliminate the ambiguity. Mar 14, 2015 at 22:22
  • 1
    For the general question asked, conspecific in the other answer is better. But for the specific example given, specimen is excellent.
    – PLL
    Mar 15, 2015 at 11:42
1

Your sentence looks like it needs a less technical word than some of the other answers. I would go with this:

I actually have some young seedlings of this species. It will be interesting to compare them to their older cousins.

of course cousins refers to close family members (but not as close as brothers and sisters) so here it is used as a metaphor. But it is an extremely common metaphor.

The disadvantage is that it is vague and only tells us that the other plants are closely related, not that they of the same species. But you already told us that they are of the same species in the previous sentence. Nature documentaries frequently use the word cousin in this (rather literary) way to refer to organisms of the same species, the same genus, or even the same phylum when it is clear from the context what is meant.

0

It's an adjective form rather than a noun, but a commonly-used lay term for this is just "same-species".

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.