2

I know that this sentence is correct:

"He is not a man to tell a lie."

Is it also correct if I say

"He is not a man tell a lie."

If it's correct what is the difference between these sentences? And when I use the infinitive without to, what is the theme in grammar?

  • 2
    "He is not a man tell a lie" is not grammatical. Using ellipsis you could say "He is not a man tells a lie," in which the "who" would be dropped from "who tells". When using the infinitive, you have to use to. It's the law. – Robusto Mar 11 '15 at 18:38
  • 1
    Another relative infinitive construction; relative infinitives require the to, but do not allow relative pronouns, except with pied-piping, like a lie with which to fool them, but a lie to fool them with, and not *a lie which to fool them with. – John Lawler Mar 11 '15 at 18:50
  • @Robusto I'm not saying you are wrong. But I would struggle to remember the last time I heard it. – WS2 Mar 11 '15 at 19:15
  • @WS2. I have heard it in rural dialects, and you see it in writers like Twain et al. when they're affecting rural speech. – Robusto Mar 11 '15 at 19:41
  • Consider- He is not a man you can lie to. – Manish Mar 11 '15 at 20:34
1

All English verbs have a base form, an inflected form, and a participial form. For regular verbs, the base form is the same as the inflected form for all person-number combinations other than 3sg. The base form is used in an infinitival construction, which requires the preposition to. The preposition to is also associated with a purposive meaning in certain constructions (e.g., More than one way _to skin a cat_). In Spanish or French, the infinitive form of the verb does not have purposive meaning by itself. A preposition (para or pour, for example) must be used to get that meaning.

I think that the reason for the question is that the OP might be familiar with a language like Spanish or French where an infinitival construction is formed using a specific inflection of the verb, and no associated preposition.

0

'He is a not a man tell a lie'

This sententance is not gramatically correct, for when spoken, the natural way to say this is to split it into two parts.

'He is not a man, tell a lie' Which whilst abreviated, would work. If you are looking for other ways to say your beginning sentance, may I suggest;

He is a man who wouldn't tell a lie He is not a man to be decietfull

Obviously, you can work this in a hundred different variations.

Lying is not in this mans nature He would never lie to me

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.