This is from a video I watched. The police are watching a suspect. The first sentence is fine, but I couldn't figure out the bold part. The quote is:

We set up an overwatch position across the street and he didn't move that we weren't with him.

  • It means he didn't move that they weren't aware of his position at every moment. – Amir Sabanovic Mar 7 '15 at 16:05
  • he didn't move SO they weren't aware of his position at every moment? – aytug2001 Mar 7 '15 at 16:15
  • 2
    No, he didn't make a move that they did not see. – Amir Sabanovic Mar 7 '15 at 16:19

There's an "elided" phrase before (or "replaced by") that in this (not desperately uncommon, but IMHO slightly "slangy/dialectal" and/or dated) usage...

He didn't move [in any circumstances] that we weren't with him.
He didn't move [when] we weren't with him.

Removing the cumbersome negation from both verbs, and reversing the sequence...

We were with him whenever he moved

I can't easily track down a free-access website covering this usage, but here's the relevant definition from the full (subscription-only) OED...

that 5.
With a negative in the subord. clause (the principal clause having also a negative expressed or implied): = But that, but (= Latin quin): see but conj. 12 (Now expressed by without with gerund: e.g. in quot. 1809, ‘without her hearing’.)

Usage instances...
1809 R. Southey Let. to Lieut. Southey 19 Sept.
He never turned in his bed during that whole time that she did not hear.

1837 S. R. Maitland 6 Lett. Fox's A. & M. 69,
I have hardly ever..turned it over for five minutes, that some gross error has not presented itself.

|improve this answer|||||

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.