A picture shared on Instagram (original source unknown) contains the following grammar joke:

enter image description here

“Well done, well-done, or well, done?”

And, this being a grammar joke, I’d assume it uses correct English. But I can’t help thinking that there should be a comma before the last “well”:

“Well done, well-done, or, well, done?”

Is the comma optional here? Is it allowed? Or am I entirely misunderstanding the function of the “well” here and it’s not an interjection?

(Incidentally, my query implicitly assumes that the comma before “or” is an Oxford comma and doesn’t form part of the interjection. Is this correct?)

  • 1
    (Incidentally, as I understand it “well done” and “well-done” are completely synonymous, that is they could both refer to either the quality or the cooking time.) Feb 25, 2015 at 15:36
  • Well done means done well, i.e, a good job of cooking. Well-done in terms of beef means completely cooked, no red meat inside. Feb 25, 2015 at 15:58
  • @JohnLawler According to the definition I linked, it can mean either (before looking this up I’d have agreed with you.) Feb 25, 2015 at 16:09
  • It can mean either, but if it's being repeated here with well-done, it must mean something different. I didn't say it was a very good joke, but it's understandable. Feb 25, 2015 at 16:32
  • "You have a choice. I'll call them 'well done', 'well-done', and 'well ... done'" The third 'well' is the mitigation marker, not the secondary modifier. Feb 25, 2015 at 18:47

1 Answer 1


There should be a comma before the last "well." You're correct that it's an interjection.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.