Reading recent postings about syllables I've been struck and baffled by talk of the possibility that words may have a different number of syllables when they are written than when they are spoken.

Is "church" one syllable or two?

How many syllables are in the word 'hour'?

As a musician I am very clear that a book of music is just that, a book containing a (more or less helpful) representation of music. The book itself is not a piece of music (any more than Magritte's painting of a pipe 'is' actually a pipe). Only the sound of music is music. It is also my view (and among musicians I'm not out on any kind of limb!) that wonderful and awe-inspiring as music theory is to me, it is based on the work of a succession of rule-breaking composers. Music theory has always, and can only, play catch-up with music practice.

Do you think this is the case with language ? When I say church I make two clear sounds. I think you have to. On what grounds could church be said to have only one syllable ?

The OED offers that syllable is

a vocal sound or set of sounds uttered with a single effort of articulation and forming a word or an element of a word; each of the elements of spoken language comprising a sound of greater sonority (vowel or vowel-equivalent) with or without one or more sounds of less sonority (consonants or consonant-equivalents).

If I say, "I'll meet you at the church" - church involves, for me, two 'efforts of articulation' ... two syllables?

  • 2
    It's certainly not defined etymologically. Etymology is the province of roots. Most would say the English word nest has one syllable, but it has two roots: *en- 'in', and *sed- 'sit'. Syllables are best exemplified either with an oscilloscope or as a "chest pulse", as Pike used to call it. They do vary from language to language, as do morae and syllable weights. Jan 31, 2015 at 4:10
  • 3
    A syllable is a beat -- it's a rhythmic notion. I can say "church" with two syllables, if I try: chur-chsh. Think of the sound of a steam-engine train starting up: chur-chshshsh, chur-chshsh, chur-chsh (going faster). There's nothing to say that a syllable has to have a vowel. American Indian languages of the northwest are notorious for having syllables without vowels. But the thing is, I don't say the English word "church" with two syllables. I could, but I don't, when I'm speaking normal English.
    – Greg Lee
    Jan 31, 2015 at 4:29
  • 2
    @FumbleFingers: we're getting off-topic, but the two-syllable pronunciation of temporary sounds very British to me. In temporary, military, and so forth, Americans put secondary stress on the ar syllable. Americans pronounce temporary with either three (temprary) or four syllables Jan 31, 2015 at 14:48
  • 2
    As for "church", I stand firmly in the middle. Could be one syllable or two, depending on who's talking, who's listening, and the context.
    – Hot Licks
    Jan 31, 2015 at 19:30
  • 2
    @Mitch It's not just a question of the number of syllables. Take "despicable" for example. To me the 1st syllable is "des" and the 2nd is "pic," but at least in the US most people say "de" "spic." Someone might convince you that the etymology suggests the s should be on one side or the other, but as you say syllables are just a matter of pronunciation and people are going to pronounce words as they wish. So I say etymology influences, but does not dictate, pronunciation.P.S I hope you don't succeed in closing this "fascinating question." It pertains to ELU and I wouldn't see it elsewhere.
    – Airymouse
    Feb 7, 2017 at 14:21

2 Answers 2


Not all English speakers pronounce all words with the same number of syllables.
However there are general agreements as to how many syllables any word has. This is certainly true in singing.

In traditional music, one syllable will be sung on one note. Of course, if there are more syllables than notes, one "cheats" and adds notes. More notes than syllables, then one can "cheat: by distorting the word to created new syllables. Many songs have an even syllable to note equation. The "cheating" usually happens when there is an attempt to fit too many or too few words to an established tune,
In the well known song "Mary Had a Little Lamb", there are exactly the same number of syllables as notes in the tune. I have never noted any problems with this song as to syllabification.
Often persons who are not native speakers of English and speak English with an "accent" exhibit no such "accent" when singing English songs. Native and non-native speakers follow the same syllables with the same stress dictated by the tune. If one wished to assure the convention as to number of syllables is followed, one could do worse than to practice singing single syllable words on a single note

Almost always, the number of syllables in an English word is determined by the number of sounds (vowels) in the word; not the number of written vowels, but the number of distinct vowel sounds.


The second vowel in "little" is not written. Tl could not be pronounced without the understood vowel.
Etymology would have little to do with syllabification, unless one were trying to pronounce a current English word in the manner of some previous era. That does not occur very often.
I'm not sure this is a very serious issue for the most part. Probably few care if a syllable is added or subtracted in speaking as long as the meaning of the word is clear. Unless one is singing.

  • Very interesting. From a singing perspective the final 'ch' of church is rarely (never?) sung. If 'church' is the final word of a phrase then the final 'ch' is added without an extra note. If 'church' is followed by another word the final 'ch' is usually swallowed or elided.
    – Dan
    Feb 14, 2017 at 21:14
  • I had not wished to get into "church". I can touch my diaphragm with a hand, and feel only ONE motion as I say church, repeatedly. I only pronounce the one syllable. I cannot even imagine hearing "Church": pronounced.with more than one syllable.If I had to imagine it, it would probably be "chu-urch".. It may be easier for me to unfailingly pronounce a single syllable, as I pronounce the word "Cherch", like "perch". Without hearing how you say or have heard "Church", I am in the Twilight Zone as to how to relate.
    – J. Taylor
    Feb 14, 2017 at 21:36
  • There is probably an unrelated "sound" after pronouncing "Church" that is a result of the release of the vocal mechanism, a "sound" that is not part of the word, That is because the mouth is resetting in anticipation of the nest task.. Air might still be flowing through the mouth and a slight whisper could result..
    – J. Taylor
    Feb 14, 2017 at 21:39
  • Fascinating. If I clap when I say 'church', the sound I am making after the clap is made by my mouth not my diaphragm. It is, however, integral to my speaking of the word and not any kind of buccal 'resetting'!
    – Dan
    Feb 15, 2017 at 13:31
  • 1
    I put a hand over my mouth in addition to closing it, and I felt air coming through the nose. But, I could not say it was a sound. We really need a recording. The computer says it is time for us to stop.
    – J. Taylor
    Feb 15, 2017 at 20:16

Syllables are only related to speaking. A syllable is determined by a vowel pronunciation. In the U.S., secretary is a four syllable word. In the U.K., it is usually only three syllables. Writing does not determine syllables. One's pronunciation or the pronunciation indicators in a dictionay determine syllables. As to "hour", it is a diphthong in southern U.S. (two vowel sounds gliding together in one syllable), but is two distinct syllables in the U.S. North, like ow-wer". Same goes for fire and oil. Church is very clearly one syllable, since it has only one vowel pronounced, unless you know of a locale where it is pronounced "chur-chah".

Sounds made without any vowel, such as "Whewww!" for relief of danger, are not words and have no vowel sounds. Shouting "Arghh" like a pirate could be considered a word with one syllable.

Words in a song are not nearly as exact as one might think. "A-may-zee-ing-grace" is sung as five distinct tones, but if one spoke this phrase in conversation, it would be only four syllables. In "Angels We Have Heard on High", the word "Gloria" is sung with many syllables or tones. Spoken, it is only three... unless a dialect pronounces it as "glor-yah". Then the second syllable is a diphthong. Many languages have diphthongs. In Mandarin Chinese, there are dozens, such as "tian" for sky / heaven / day or "guo" for a melon-like fruit. If you pronounced tian as two syllables like "tee-ann", most Chinese would not understand you. Same for guo pronounced like "Goo-wah".

  • If that title "Angels We Have Heard on High" is unfamiliar to readers, they might instead know "Angels from the Realms of Glory". In its refrain, the word Gloria is sung to many successive pitches. The notation in which they'd be written would need many notes to represent them. Tones don't come into it, and although the [ɔ:] sound is sung for a long time to many pitches, the [glɔ:] is still only one syllable.
    – Rosie F
    Oct 29, 2019 at 19:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.