I am looking for a noun to describe the role of "Person A" in the following scenario.

  1. Person A makes a digital project (e.g. a video game, animation, video, etc).
  2. Person B creates a digital project using Person A's project, either parts or the whole thing.

I am calling Person B's project a remix of Person A's project. Also, I am calling Person B a remixer.

What would you call Person A? Some of the terms I've used are but that I am not 100% happy with are:

  • remixee. I like this one but its a bit obscure and easy to visually confuse with the term remixer.
  • original creator. This is easy to understand but it's two words and it has the problem that it makes it seem as if the remixer is not original, which has a subtle but negative undertone.
  • originator.

Other ideas?

  • 1
    Interesting question. In a sense this word would be the mirror image of the plagiarist. – ogerard Apr 24 '11 at 18:31
  • I don't have any votes left for today, but progenitor is the best response you've received thus far, IMO. – Uticensis Apr 24 '11 at 18:46
  • @ogerard: well, plagiarist has a negative connotation. In this case I'm trying to acknowledge the positive aspects of remixing and come up with something more neutral. – amh Apr 25 '11 at 0:28
  • Person A is the meme'ist and person B is the meme'er. – logicbird Apr 25 '11 at 12:04
  • As an aside, the chain of derivatives from an original is often described as the work's providence. – Carl Smith Jul 20 '13 at 14:04

In copyright law, party B's work is called "derivative". The previous work is called "preexisting", so he could be described as the "preexisting author".



  1. An originator of a line of descent; a precursor.
  2. An originator; a founder: progenitors of the new music.
  • 1
    @pageman: please note that on SE sites, leaving a comment saying "+1" means that you have actually upvoted the post (which in this case you haven't). – RegDwigнt Apr 24 '11 at 21:15
  • Thanks. I am not 100% sold on this one but it is definitely a very good alternative. – amh Apr 25 '11 at 0:31

You might want to try out first party or principal.

  • Principal Author sounds unambiguous and clear to me. First Party sounds like contractual mumbo-jumbo. – Warren P Apr 25 '11 at 23:55




Interesting question :-)

  • Source could work. The others not so much because the remixer is also a creator and an author. – amh Apr 25 '11 at 0:30
  • I like source as well. It's also the name of a popular hip-hop magazine, a genre known for its musical sampling and remixing. – Callithumpian Apr 25 '11 at 0:41

These are reasonable multi-word stabs:

  • "Author of the original work"
  • "Original Author"
  • "Principal Author"
  • "Prima facie Author"

I like your idea "originator" but it lacks zing, and it lacks the implied Authorial ownership, and thus, if you really really want to drop it down to a single word, I can only suggest using a term which preserves the dignity of their essential ownership:

  • "Author"
  • "Creator"

Then, for the derivatives, call them "Mixologists", "Mashupologists" or something like that.


Original Content Provider Original Copyright Holder (from a Creative Commons perspective)


Well, there is always victim.

protected by RegDwigнt Jan 16 '13 at 19:09

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.