A lot of people I know argue that you should use the article "an" before words such as "historian", "history", "hotel", "hospital", "heretic". I don't want to debate whether or not this is correct or merely pretentious affectation, but I'm curious about how it should be pronounced.

If I decide to use "an" before "historian", should I pronounce the H? Should I say "an historian" or "an istorian"?

  • 12
    I... I don't understand. The article depends on the pronunciation of the word that follows. Not the other way round. You can't just decide to use "an" before "student" and then ask how it should be pronounced. I am very tempted to just close this as a dupe of “A historic…” or “An historic…”?
    – RegDwigнt
    Commented Apr 19, 2011 at 21:01
  • 1
    @RegDwight: OP isn't asking about a/an in general, just in the specific case of (certain?) words starting with h. And even Cerberus is a bit off-target, so this is obviously a tricksy little point. Luckily, kiamlaluno's quote from NOAD seems to cover it pretty well. Commented Apr 19, 2011 at 21:12
  • 3
    @lonesomeday: well, in that case, may I humbly direct your attention to Use of “a” versus “an”, easily found via the "faq" tab under "Questions" (not blaming you, even many regulars are not aware that it exists). Some special cases: Do you use “a” or “an” before acronyms?, “a/an” preceding a parenthetical statement.
    – RegDwigнt
    Commented Apr 19, 2011 at 21:14
  • 1
    @Reg No need to do it humbly -- that's an excellent question to point to. Commented Apr 19, 2011 at 21:16
  • 1
    I've figured out what's going on with "I sawr him." When I say "I told him", I barely pronounce the "h" (unless I'm emphasizing him) and I believe it's common in American speech to drop it completely. So even if the "h" is pronounced, if it's pronounced very faintly, an intrusive "r" makes sense. Commented Apr 22, 2011 at 13:15

5 Answers 5


[Edited:] My advice would be not to pronounce the h after an. This what I have always heard style books recommend.

I assumed that most people, if not all, who use an did not pronounce the h. I certainly can't remember ever hearing h pronounced after an; but it is always very dangerous to predict whether something is always or never the case. Wait, let me rephrase that: it is nearly always very dangerous... The main cause of this danger is that there will nearly always (see, I am learning) be exceptions. Even so, I believe they are exceptions; if someone disagrees and provides a decent argument or evidence, I will edit this answer again.

The use of a versus an in English is almost entirely based on whether the next word is pronounced as a vowel or not. The way it is spelled usually does not matter; compare a user, an honour. Based on this pattern, the advice of style books, and what I suspect is the pronunciation of a large majority, pronouncing the h with an seems like a bad idea. The fact that some people on this very page and elsewhere perceive it as "affected", and that it will displease traditionalists, would seem reason enough to drop either the h or an. A traditionalist might think, "hey, that guy is trying to sound cool, but he fails miserably, because he doesn't quite understand how it works", even if the speaker did in fact understand, but simply made a different choice. Such is snobbery.

  • You do sometimes hear an hotel, for example. Personally I think it's a bit of an affectation, but I'm pretty sure our UK news presenter Jermemy Paxman does it. And I surely would not wish to bandy words with him about whether he 'talks proper'. Commented Apr 19, 2011 at 21:04
  • If, as Cerberus notes, "The use of a v. an in English is purely based on whether the next word is pronounced as a vowel or not, nothing else", then what is all the talk of affectations and misuse. It stands to reason that these speakers are following the only rule English has to determine whether to choose a or an.
    – Dan
    Commented Apr 19, 2011 at 22:11
  • @FumbleFingers: OK, I assumed opinion on this was less divided, and practice more uniform, than it apparently is. I have changed my answer; do you think this is better? I still think it is a bad idea to pronounce the h after an, so I've kept that as the core of my answer. Commented Apr 19, 2011 at 22:54
  • @Cerebus: So long as Jeremy Paxman isn't reading this, I'm happy to say I agree absolutely with everything you say. If he is, I'd better dive for cover and admit that some careful speakers use an if the following word starts with an aspirated 'h' and the first syllable is unstressed. It grates on my ear, but the fact is they do it - justifiably, in their opinion. On reflection, I'm now pretty sure Paxman says "a hotel", but "an historic". Commented Apr 19, 2011 at 23:08
  • Worth pointing out that dropping the h on historic is an American English pronunciation. Regardless of whether you choose to use 'a' or 'an' in front of it, British English speakers pronounce the h (Oxford Dictionary). Dropping the h would mark your accent as either unrefined - for want of a better word ;) Alternatively, it could mark it as overrefined if you also peppered your speech with other 18th Centuryisms like 'weskit' for 'waistcoat'.
    – gpr
    Commented Apr 19, 2011 at 23:19

The NOAD I had on my Mac Mini had a note similar to the following one, which Oxford Living Dictionaries reports about an and its usage with words starting with h.

Is it "a historical document" or "an historical document"? "A hotel" or "an hotel"?
There is still some divergence of opinion over which form of the indefinite article should be used before words that begin with h and have an unstressed first syllable. In the 18th and 19th centuries, people often did not pronounce the initial h for these words, and so an was commonly used. Today the h is pronounced, and so it is logical to use a rather than an. However, the indefinite article an is still encountered before the h in both British and American English, particularly with historical: in the Oxford English Corpus around a quarter of examples of historical are preceded with an rather than a.

The pronunciation reported by the Oxford Living Dictionaries for hotel is /hoʊˈtɛl/, and for historical is /hɪˈstɔrək(ə)l/; similarly, the pronunciation of historian is /hɪˈstɔriən/.


Usually not.

For the most part, as Cerberus says, the use of a vs. an is based on whether the next word is pronounced with an initial consonant or not; so an would only be used when the h is pronounced.

However, the peculiar case of an historic etc. is one of those times when prescriptivism/snobbery/etc. has affected the language too much to be separable from “natural usage”. I know many people whose accent would normally pronounce the h of historic, but who subscribe on more or less deliberately affected grounds to an historic, in writing and (less often) in speech. From memory, I’m fairly sure I have heard it spoken sometimes as an historic with the h pronounced.

However, I can’t find to find audio/video evidence online to back this up. The two examples of an historic I’ve found so far: A US congressman (at about 06:46:50), who gives it no h that I can hear; and a New Zealand librarian (at 00:24), who has no distinct h but has, I think, perceptibly more aspiration than after an than there would normally be for a following vowel.

  • 5
    It might be worth mentioning that etymologically (or should I say, historically), a is a variant of an; not the other way round. In other words, the n disappeared before consonants, rather than being added before vowels.
    – RegDwigнt
    Commented Apr 19, 2011 at 21:33
  • 1
    Okay, I have adjusted my assumption that hardly anyone would ever pronounce the h with an. But my advice still remains "don't do it"... if your advice is "usually not", do you suppose it would be a good idea to do it in a group where everybody's doing it, or something like that? I guess peer pressure can be a good enough reason to do things you otherwise wouldn't do, hehe... Commented Apr 19, 2011 at 23:02
  • 2
    Whenever I hear "an historic" (or the like, and I should note it is only on television, usually the BBC), the 'h' is not silent.
    – Marcin
    Commented Jul 9, 2011 at 14:39
  • One frequently hears it on BBC Radio 4. "An historic" being an example. Commented Nov 24, 2014 at 23:16

There appear to be people who say "an historian", pronouncing both the "n" and the "h", in the U.K. I don't think this is the case with most American speakers who use "an" with "historian". Let me explain what I think is going on.

In my speech (a variety of American English), an /h/ in an unaccented syllable following a consonant is either not pronounced or absorbed into the consonant, so the consonant becomes slightly more aspirated. See this question. So in "their historical building" the /r/ and the /h/ merge together to form a slightly breathier /r/. And after most consonants, the /h/ vanishes entirely. This wouldn't happen with "their histories", where the /h/ is in an accented syllable and thus pronounced.

You can see that both "an istorian" and "a historian" are consistent with this system for pronouncing /h/. Which one a speaker says is probably a matter of what they heard when they were learning English. Most speakers of American English use "a" with "historian", but there is a minority that uses "an". Speakers who use "an" would say /hɪˈstɔriən/ after a vowel, but say /ənɪˈstɔriən/, either without the /h/ or with a very faint /h/. The same speakers would also drop the /h/ in the sentence "I find historians interesting."

As some evidence that this is really what is going on, I recently heard within the space of two or three minutes the same speaker of American English say "a historical" /əhɪˈstɔrɪkl/ with the "h" and "an istorical" /ənɪˈstɔrikl/ without it.


This question is a little bit like asking "what is the correct pronunciation of 'an biscuit'?". You're asking for the 'correct' pronunciation of a form which is essentially ungrammatical (probably).

In 2011, there's probably no "real" natural pronunciation of "an historic". The form probably only occurs as a hypercorrection by people who have seen such forms written down from a previous stage of the language. At one time, the "h" of various words (including "history", "hotel") behaved essentially as in the "h" or "heir" and "hour". Nowadays, they basically don't; the usual, naturally occurring form is "a history", "a historic event", "a hotel" etc. 200 years ago, pronouncing "an 'istoric" rather than "a historic" was probably as natural as saying "a biscuit" rather than "an biscuit" today. But this is no longer the case.

However, a few speakers do in writing ape the previous usage, and this then leads to the "problem" of how to pronounce a form that essantially "doesn't occur" naturally. In practice you will often hear speakers pronounce the "h". As I say, I think the form per se is essentially a hypercorrection, so to ask whether you "should" pronounce the "h" seems to me a meaningless question.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.