2

I wonder what is the meaning of for in this sentence. "Elizabeth suddenly sees Darcy for who he is" please explain the meaning with some examples. how can I say that sentence in another way? Bahman

closed as off-topic by tchrist, Janus Bahs Jacquet, anongoodnurse, Drew, Robusto Dec 15 '14 at 3:19

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. A list of these references can be found here: List of general references" – tchrist, Janus Bahs Jacquet, anongoodnurse, Drew, Robusto
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    'See someone/something for who he is/what it is' is an idiom for 'see someone as they really are' / 'see something as it really is', not as he/it may appear at first glance. There are related expressions, I'd say less appropriate: 'love someone as he really is' has been used for 'love someone just as he is'. An attempt to pin a meaning on 'for' here would be, in my view, unprofitable. – Edwin Ashworth Dec 12 '14 at 15:54
  • 1
    I love the fact that with just one sentence, we all know what book you are reading. :D – IchabodE Dec 12 '14 at 19:26
  • @MBurke One of Mark Hebden's Inspector Pel novels? – Edwin Ashworth Dec 12 '14 at 20:47
  • Yes, @MBurke , no doubt about it. Except that line ain't Jane Austen. – pazzo Dec 13 '14 at 8:47
  • 'Elizabeth suddenly sees the true Darcy' is another way to put it. – pazzo Dec 13 '14 at 8:49
3

This is indeed a strange idiom, for it appears extremely redundant (if you can see someone, how can you not see them for who they are?). I expect this is particularly vexing to those not used to English as their first language.

The meaning of this phrase is to understand a person's true nature, or at least certain important attributes of their personality. It is usually employed when a person's actions suddenly reveal something about them which a another person might not have assumed based on their previous knowledge and/or assumptions. Usually, it refers to a negative quality which a person might want to keep hidden, or which might be surprising because it is not how a presumably good person would act. Frequently, it implies a drastic change in how a person feels about another, and whether their relationship can continue as it was.

Other ways to phrase this might be "Elizabeth suddenly understood Darcy's true nature." A more specific "and arbitrary" example might be "Darcy's treatment of the child made Elizabeth see him in a different light," or "Elizabeth felt that Darcy's behavior this evening had revealed his true colors."

1

It's the same for = as = like = in the manner of usage as...

I want you as/for a friend, not [as/for] a lover

OP's example could be replaced (somewhat less idiomatically) by...

She sees him as [who] he is

...but note that syntactically we can't discard who (or what, particularly with an inanimate referent) in the for version.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.