I am a mathematician, working with things called 1k-regular polytopes, dubbed thus by Conway. For the case of k = 2, as in ½-regular, it is naturally pronounced and written half-regular.

However, I am now dealing with the ⅓‑regular case, and I’m surprised to find that saying third-regular doesn’t sound right at all!

After considering for a while, I realized that using ordinals to denote fractions here always sounds wrong, but that when there is a different word, it works. For instance, saying quarter-regular for ¼-regular sounds fine, but fourth-regular does not.

This leads to a couple of related questions. In my US-based usage, I would have assumed that quarter and fourth were perfect synonyms for describing fractions. For instance, I can say:

  • The project is three-quarters complete.
  • The project is three-fourths complete.
  • A quarter of the people left.
  • A fourth of the people left.

But evidently, they are not as perfect as one might wish. Does the difference lie solely in whether or not the word can be used as a prefix?

For instance, saying a quarter-full glass sounds fine, while saying a fourth-full glass does not, because when pronounced out loud it sounds like you have four full glasses and are referencing the fourth of these. Are there other differences?

Is there a way to form such a prefix form for ⅓ or other cases?

I have imagined something like tertiarily regular, but I don't think that really means what I want. Consider a tertiarily full glass: that doesn’t work for me. This answer suggests tertile, but I don’t think that works here. Tertile-regular certainly doesn’t sound very good.

Metric prefixes will work when available, like deciregular for ¹⁄₁₀ and centiregular for ¹⁄₁₀₀. Can these be extended beyond powers of ten?

This question asks for a “quarter” equivalent for ¹⁄₉, with the answer that no such term exists. But it wasn’t focused on prefix forms.

  • 4
    This came up today in a different context; I made several comments about the combinatory use of quarter here. For comparison, how is 1/k-regular pronounced? One-kay-regular? One-kayth-regular? One-over-kay-regular? Reciprocal-kay-regular? Commented Dec 7, 2014 at 21:57
  • 2
    Tierce-regular might work, once folks have looked up what tierce means. ;)
    – Joe Dark
    Commented Dec 7, 2014 at 22:40
  • 2
    Just say "one over N regular" which works for any N. There's a reason nobody reads math papers aloud for entertainment.
    – Oldcat
    Commented Dec 8, 2014 at 19:55
  • 1
    @JohnLawler: One-over-kay-pause-regular. And hmm why hasn't anyone suggested "one-third-regular" for the special case of 3?
    – user21820
    Commented Jan 4, 2015 at 14:00

1 Answer 1


Fourth-regular is ambiguous, because it's unclear if it's 1/4 regular or fourth in a sequence. Ninth-regular has the same issue.

One-fourth-regular or one-ninth-regular lacks this ambiguity. It sounds unusual, but it's an unusual construct.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.