13

Until a decade ago, people were chatting, reading books or napping in commuter trains and public buses. Today, almost everybody sitting beside you and in the opposite row of seats is holding a smartphone at nose level and absorbed in games, surfing websites, and tweeting in the train and bus. They are looking at their smartphones on the platform while waiting for their train to arrive. I occasionally bump into a pedestrian who is looking at their smartphone while walking on the street. This didn't happen with mobile phones. I don’t know whether it’s a social phenomenon unique to Japan or common to anywhere in the world. But to me, as someone who is in his eighties, it seems weird.

A Japanese TV programme described the ubiquitous phenomenon of those who cannot part with their smartphones anywhere or at any time “Internet dependence”.

What is the common English word to describe those who are heavily (or morbidly) dependent on their smartphones? Are they “Internet dependent,” as the TV calls them, “smartphone addicts,” or simply today’s normal smartphone users?

PS: There was an interesting article in connection with this question in the latest (November 26) New Yorker magazine under the title, “Is Internet Addiction a Real Thing? http://www.newyorker.com/science/maria-konnikova/internet-addiction-real-thing

I think “smartphone addict” is an archetype of "Internet addiction.”

  • 1
    Also see linked questions – James Waldby - jwpat7 Dec 1 '14 at 1:38
  • @yoichi Oishi: Aprt from the question. We could consider this as a world human issue(negatively) which will create issue in person to person directly communication. and reduct talks.. – Esha Dec 1 '14 at 7:07
  • 2
    Related and amusing (?) is phubbing: the habit of snubbing someone in favour of a mobile phone. google.com/… – Jim Reynolds Dec 1 '14 at 10:28
  • There is probably a large overlap between digital natives and digital addicts. It might even be a symptom of being a digital native to be "addicted". I use quotes because I'm not sure the term "addiction" is correctly used; of course it will seem like an unhealthy addiction to people over 30, but for those under 30, 24/7/365-connectedness is simply a way of life, and for many people under 20, is the only way of life they know. It's what's normal, and what's necessary in their lives, so that they might stay current with what's going on with their peers. – TylerH Dec 1 '14 at 16:27
  • How about 'idiot'? – Rand al'Thor Dec 1 '14 at 16:33
13

The person is smartphone dependent or a smartphone addict. The typical "addict" is a teenager or young adult, between ages ten and 30. They are numerous in all affluent countries and in some developing countries as well.

Read Smartphone dependency: a growing obsession with gadgets

Are you smartphone dependent? What a typical addict tells us about this:

"I'll admit it: I check my smartphone compulsively. And the more I use it, the more often the urge to look at it hits me. Where? In the orthodontist's office. Walking my kids to school. In meetings. Even while making breakfast. Sometimes it is in my hand before I even know what I'm searching for. Sometimes I tap the screen absent mindedly -- looking at my email, a local blogger, my calendar, and Twitter". Health & Balance

6

In one of the linked questions, Hugo posted the following answer:

In an similar vein to idiot box, a derogatory name for someone who uses their mobile phone a lot is smartphone zombie.

As evidence, they provide Urban Dictionary a CNN story on smartphone zombies, and a Flickr collection of photos that uses the expression as its title. This article from november 2014 shows the expression is still in use by the media, although I've never heard it before.

In another related question, Manish introduces the term "nomophobia" (from no mobile), which refers to the anxiety some people experience when they don't have their mobiles. His source is wikipedia. That suggests "nomophobe" as a potential answer for your question. I also never heard this expression, although it has also recently been in media, in september 2014.

I tried google-trending the candidate expressions that seem reasonable, with little success. Below is the graph, "nomophobia" is the only term with enough hits to actually plot. The remaining terms are "smartphone addict", "smartphone dependant" and "smartphone zombie".

Google trends graph

  • 2
    It must be true; it's on Wikipedia! – Agi Hammerthief Dec 1 '14 at 11:02
  • 3
    Your google trending query is not helpful, because "smartphone" is in such a massive usage that most any other term will have zero return in the trend analysis. Eliminate it, and you see that "nomophobia" relatively dwarfs your other terms. – John Dec 1 '14 at 20:56
  • "Nomophobe" would be a non-starter in American English, where the term "mobile" is rarely if ever used in this sense. It smacks of European or at least British usage to this native West Coast AmE speaker. – dodgethesteamroller Dec 3 '14 at 18:09
2

I like 'dependent' as suggested by Centaurus, but what about an alternative being 'reliant' as in 'smart phone reliant'.

Another alternative would be 'obsessive'.

more colloquial might be 'smart phone junkie' or 'smart phone nerd' - a little bit pejorative.

  • 1
    I don't think "reliant" works because it doesn't suggest that the person uses the phone all the time, just that they rely on it for many things. For example, I'm reliant on food but I only eat a few times a day. – David Richerby Dec 1 '14 at 10:20
  • @DavidRicherby good point, but I think the same point and example could be make with dependent - I'm dependent on food but I only eat a few times a day also works - it is a colloquial usage of the word reliant - and dependent- – tom Dec 1 '14 at 19:29
  • "Smart phone junkie" is the best term I've seen so far. – Hot Licks Dec 1 '14 at 20:41
2

Colloquially, I've seen people who use technology to avoid social interaction referred to as square‑eyes.

  • 2
    Does't Square-eys only refer to heavy TV watcher, not smartphone addict? – Yoichi Oishi Dec 1 '14 at 5:51
  • 1
    Language changes over time, you know the rest. I think it's applicable here. =) – David Lord Dec 1 '14 at 6:25
1

Not everyone will get the reference, but you could call these people gargoyles.

protected by Community Dec 1 '14 at 12:15

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.