A segue is the transition from one topic to another, but I am thinking of a word for tying together two things that have previously been talked about. For example, we're discussing whether cats or dogs are better pets, and then that conversation drifts off topic into something apparently unrelated, like visual impairments or something, and then someone says "Aha! Well, dogs are colorblind, so cats are the better pet after all!".

I remember reading an article in which someone mentioned a pithy name for such tie-ins, and I think it might have been a Latin word vaguely related to segue, but I could be totally wrong on that and it was boring ol' English after all. Does anyone know what word or phrase I'm thinking of, or have a reasonable substitute I can use when telling my friend that his attempt to connect these two unrelated topics is not very impressive?


That sounds like a literary device known as an "allusion" (from literarydevices.net):

Allusion is a brief and indirect reference to a person, place, thing or idea of historical, cultural, literary or political significance. It does not describe in detail the person or thing to which it refers. It is just a passing comment and the writer expects the reader to possess enough knowledge to spot the allusion and grasp its importance in a text.

For instance, you make a literary allusion the moment you say, “I do not approve of this quixotic idea,” Quixotic means stupid and impractical derived from Cervantes’s “Don Quixote”, a story of a foolish knight and his misadventures.

Comics use this device to circle back on a earlier theme from their routine - usually with great success, surprise and hopefully laughter from the audience.

| improve this answer | |

You seem to be talking about synthesis, described at Wikipedia as ‘a combination of two or more entities that together form something new’.

The term figures prominently in the classical philosophical process of dialectic, which hinges on the ideas of thesis (a proposition), antithesis (a challenge to that proposition) and synthesis (something new that emerges from discussing the two in a firmly reasoned way). Dialectic literally means something like ‘speaking through, or across’, and is about rationally connecting ideas that seem somehow antagonistic. Wikipedia again: ‘The outcome of such a dialectic might be the refutation of a relevant proposition, or of a synthesis, or a combination of the opposing assertions, or a qualitative improvement of the dialogue’.

That very precise sense of synthesis in the dialectical process is specifically about ideas that are regarded as being opposed, which in most daily life would probably be fairly extreme cases, but it shows the potentially ambitious scope of the idea. The term is also used, however, to talk more generally about combining any previously unconnected (intellectual) components to form a new system of some kind.

Accordingly, Merriam-Webster defines synthesis very broadly as ‘the combining of often diverse conceptions into a coherent whole; also, the complex so formed’. That seems to be very much the phenomenon that you describe: it can be formally aimed-for (as in a dialectic), or can emerge relatively accidentally, as in the example you give.

The negative connotation that you finally mention seemed jarring at first glance, since on the whole synthesis is generally regarded as a positive thing: something new and surprising has been created through combining existing elements in a novel way. The connotations tend to be positive ones, of discovery and creativity, so ‘telling my friend that his attempt to connect these two unrelated topics is not very impressive’ initially seemed a bit odd.

Then again, in simply thinking about the concept there is nothing to say that any given synthesis should be as successful, as useful or in some other sense as elegant or pleasing as any other synthesis. Presumably some such attempts can be naive or misguided, although the act of making such an attempt might still be thought laudable.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.