Online dictionaries I have consulted are ambiguous on this. Does 'to prioritise' something mean just to give something a priority value (eg. Low) or to set that value to 'High' (or both)?

In many technical/project management fields, it is important to identify if a task's priority has been assessed. Until then, it could be said to be in an 'un-prioritised' state (not 'de-prioritised', which implies that a previously set value of priority has been reduced).

If 'to prioritise' strictly means 'to assign a value of priority', then what is the term for increasing the level of priority. Likewise, if the priority is un-set (not reduced), has it been 'un-prioritised' (as I referred to above), or maybe 'aprioritised'?

up vote 0 down vote accepted

Online dictionaries are ambiguous because the word has both meanings.

In programmer-speak, "priority" refers to both a priority value (e.g. 0-100) as well as a priority feature (has priority [over X]). Thus, "to prioritise" is both to "assign priority value" as well as "give priority [over X]".

If clarity is of essence, I'd go for the explicit: of unspecified priority, to specify priority, to increase priority, to decrease priority all refer to the priority value with little to no ambiguity.

Your Answer

 
discard

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.