2

Can "those" be used in "those good at writing" or "those who ..." to refer to a group of people shared the same attribute described by the phrase after "those"?

If it is possible (since I have found lots of examples with Google), is "those" here a noun?

0

As a general rule who + BE and which + BE can be omitted from so-called restrictive relative clauses.

  • Those who are happy with the situation ...
  • Those happy with the situation ...
  • Those who are thinking of leaving ....
  • Those thinking of leaving ...
  • Those who are regularly forgotten ...
  • Those regularly for gotten ...
  • These who have been dropped ...
  • Those dropped ...

In the examples above we see the relative pronoun who omitted from sentences with BE: as the only verb; as part of the present continuous; as part of a passive construction, and as part of a present perfect passive construction.

Now whether the examples without a relative pronoun are actually relative clauses is a matter of some debate. Some people would regard them as post-modifying adjective/participle clauses. However, this nonetheless effectively boils down to the fact that you can always omit who/which and BE from the comparable relative clauses.

Those, when used on its own like this, is classified as a pronoun. Many modern grammars treat pronouns as a subset of the Noun category. So in this sense it is a noun. Those with a following noun, however, is usually classified as a determiner. So in the following it would be classified as a determiner:

  • Those people who are satisfied with the situation ...

This of course is a rather silly situation where we have to treat the same word with ostensibly the same meaning and the same grammar as a different word just depending on what word follows it. Some forward thinking modern grammarians see those as the same kind of word in both instances.

I have occasionally seen it written that pronouns cannot serve as antecedents for relative clauses. However, this only ever really applies to accusative case pronouns: me, him, her, us, them. Even then this is more a case of awkwardness or style, perhaps, rather than ungrammaticality:

  • # May heaven forgive him who steals for his children. (debatable grammaticality)

Notice, though, that this does not apply to those - which does not inflect for case (and could be argued, therefore, to not be accusative).

  • See also this question. – Tim Lymington Oct 28 '14 at 18:33
  • @TimLymington Yes, excellent question and some interesting answers! – Araucaria - Not here any more. Oct 28 '14 at 18:37
  • 1
    Thanks for your elaboration! A misspelling by the way: "this is moe a case of awkwardness" => "this is more a case of awkwardness". – Minsheng Liu Oct 29 '14 at 10:39
2

In this case those is a pronoun.

1

Who are can be safely omitted. It is understood. The sentence is still grammatical even if we drop it.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.