0

I understand the definition of remit; so I am not asking about it. I just want to delve in deeper. I also recognise the Etymological Fallacy and its various drawbacks. So how should I interpret or rationalize its etymology, in order to intuit or naturalise it, and to help me remember?

1. remit = [chiefly British] The task or area of activity officially assigned to an individual or organization

2. An item referred to someone for consideration

Etymonline: late 14c., "to forgive, pardon," from Latin remittere "send back, slacken, let go back, abate," from re- "back" (see re-) + mittere "to send" (see mission). Meaning "allow to remain unpaid" is from mid-15c. Meaning "send money (to someone)" first recorded 1630s. Related: Remitted; remitting.

For instance, how does re- fit the 2 definitions above? Both refers someTHING NEW to someONE NEW. Yet back implies a reappraisal; so what's sent back?

Footnote: I encountered remit, in the last sentence, of the last para, of p 7 of 16 here.

  • 1
    I've always thought of "remit" as "what is properly mine". My "remit is the Northeast territory", "please remit payment for services performed", etc. – Dan Bron Oct 24 '14 at 11:17
  • @DanBron In American English, your example, "please remit payment for services performed" is the ONLY usage with which I am familiar! We use it in accounting, well, bookkeeping, a lot. – Ellie Kesselman Oct 25 '14 at 4:57
2

As a native British English speaker, I have a vague preference for stressing the first syllable for #1: "I have a wide REmit", and stressing the second for something related to remittance ("the Court of Session may accept a reMIT").

A memory aid could be:

  1. REmit is like GAmut; this is the stuff encompassed by a job, like a gamut is the colours encompassed by a printer.
  2. reMIT is like a reTURN in tennis, a court can agree to a reMIT and thus a reTURN of the case to a lower court. As "a return" is to "I return", so "A remit" is to "I remit".
| improve this answer | |
  • This answer is interesting, but its focus on pronunciation seems a bit far afield from the posted question's emphasis on varied senses of the prefix 're-' and their possibly divergent etymological trails. – Sven Yargs Dec 19 '18 at 22:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.