0

In my thesis I have a part where I provide all the algorithms which I have developed. I want to introduce this part with a chapter containing the literature review regarding these algorithms, introducing the hardware I have worked with, discussing the input data for the algorithms and some other stuff (see below)...

Do you think I can use "Preliminary Considerations" as title for this chapter? I have some doubts due to the alternative meaning of "preliminary" which I would describe as "uncomplete" or "sketchy". Although "Preliminary Considerations" seems to be a proper title, "preliminary" has the taste of "has to be completed in further work".

I hope this makes sense to you.


(Coarse) structure of my thesis:

FRONTMATTER

PART I: Introduction

PART II: Models & Theory

PART III: Algorithms
  Chapter PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS
    Section Literature Review
    Section Related Hardware
    Section Input Data
    Section ...
  Chapter Algo 1
    ...
  Chapter Algo N

BACKMATTER  
  • Preliminary literally means "Before the threshold" or "before the first step" (Latin, pre-, -limina). I would say it's exactly the right word. – Andrew Leach Oct 21 '14 at 11:49
  • What is confusing me is that I know "preliminary" also from sentences like "These are just the preliminary results" (see en.wiktionary.org/wiki/preliminary). It sometimes has the meaning of the german word "vorläufig" which is absolutely not what I want to say (see translation of "vorläufig" here: dict.cc/?s=vorl%C3%A4ufig&=DEEN&=) – matheburg Oct 21 '14 at 12:05
  • By the way: "Pre-Liminary" could also be interpreted as "before the limit" and thus as somehow "immature", couldn't it? – matheburg Oct 21 '14 at 13:12
  • I might just call it "Background Information". – JenSCDC Oct 21 '14 at 14:28
1

Preliminary Considerations is fine: its normal connotation in this context would be as a contrast to main or primary considerations, and perhaps also to final considerations. Alternatives could be Background Considerations or just Backgroumd.

1

"Preliminary Considerations" sounds ok to me - it's probably what I would call it. I'm a little surprised by "Literature Review" coming so far into the thesis, though - has the literature got nothing to say about "Models and Theory"? Still, I don't know the subject area of your thesis, so it may be fine.

  • Thank you. The literature review is spread over the thesis here; this one mentioned in my question is only regarding alternative algorithms... – matheburg Oct 21 '14 at 12:54
0

Justice J. Randolph of Walden University has suggested there are three purposes for providing a literature review:

  1. to prove your knowledge of, and familiarity with, your field of study

  2. to craft a publishable document in its own right

  3. to identify and explain a research family with which you identify (or, I assume, in case you do not identify with a research family, to identify and explain your new paradigm!)

Keeping these three purposes in mind, I suggest you make your literature review a separate "PART" of your thesis. Only when that is accomplished should you continue your thesis. Here is a suggested alternative to the approach you are currently taking:

FRONTMATTER

PART 1: Introduction

PART 2: An Overview of Models and Theory in the Literature

PART 3: Choice of Hardware and Input Data

PART 4: Algorithms Used

     I. Algorithm Number One [or the name or title of the algorhythm]

    II. Algorithm Number Two

   III. Algorithm Number Three [etc.]

BACKMATTER/CONCLUSION [where you modestly admit there is so much more to discover and suggest possible future directions in which the discipline can go to advance the field of study]

  • I really appriciate your comprehensive (and a little bit offtopic) answer and I will think about it intensively. However, the structure provided above is only a coarse version which does not reveal the true complexity of the work; it is well thought out already. – matheburg Oct 21 '14 at 14:13
  • @matheburg: You're welcome, and yeah, sometimes ya never know what non sequiter is going to spring forth from my fingertips. Nevertheless, making your review of the literature a "part" unto itself seemed like a good idea to me. With even more suggestions from other EL&U members, you should be in good stead for wrapping up your thesis. "Where no counsel is, the people fall: but in the multitude of counsellors there is safety" (Proverbs 11:14; cf. 15:22). You see, you just never know what's going to spring forth . . .. Don – rhetorician Oct 21 '14 at 16:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.