2

While looking over a company's annual report, I realized that every business quarter was denoted using roman numerals. E.g. QI,2014 QII, 2014 etc.

I am sure I am being petty and pedantic, however, do you need to express the year completely or should it be: IQ14 or 1Q14

Also, the comma used in QI, 2014 appears jarring to my mind.

Or is it just business writing?

  • 1
    “QI, 2014” seems quite an odd way to write it to me too—but then I’m not much up on my business jargon. Sounds more like it’s season L of a certain TV show. The only variant I’ve seen often enough to say I’m really familiar with it is 1q14 or 1q2014. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Oct 14 '14 at 14:34
  • Although Roman numerals are generally understood to related to ordinality, IQ is obviously confusing and thus seldom (never?) used. AFAIK, there is no single standard followed across domains. I have seen the formats 1Q2014 & 1Q-2014 in finance-related writing. The format QI/2014 is sometimes (very few cases) found too. – Kris Oct 14 '14 at 14:45
3

This is a style question. However, comma would add a visual chaos. I am not sure of the best answer. I looked up the question in the CMoS but couldn’t find the answer.

However, Investopedia, puts the quarter with its relevant year, as in Q1 2014 or Q1/14, which represents the first quarter of the year 2014.

  • I've seen it either as Q1 or 1stQ. I've never seen roman numerals used for this purpose. Mixing the meaning of letters (digits or actual letters) within a single "word" will almost always cause confusion and should be avoided. – keshlam Oct 29 '14 at 20:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.