It's not the end of the deal, right? It's not just you cut a check and you walk away.
In this sentence, why does one say "cut" a check? How and when did this comes to be? Is it a popular idiom across the English speaking world?
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.Sign up to join this community
The term "cut checks" goes back more than 150 years, but the usage is complicated by the fact that in some instances "cut checks" signified "canceled checks" while in other it signified "created checks." The allied term "cutting checks" goes back at least 147 years.
'Cut checks' as canceled checks
The earliest instance of "cut checks" (in the sense of physically canceled checks) in Google Books search results appears in Fraudulent Canal Scrip: Report of Evidence before the [Illinois State] Senate Committee on Finance (February 4–15, 1859):
Mr. Fuller. Have you a recollection of packing this unfinished scrip in the box at that time?
A[nswer, by Joel Manning]. I can't say that I have.
Mr. Cook. Have you a recollection of seeing it in the canal office subsequent to the packing of the boxes?
A. No, sir. I know we had some left uncut at the time the boxes were packed. Some of it is cut, and I know it is cut the way I cut checks. I have no doubt I packed up all there was, but I cannot remember now.
Mr. Browning. You have no recollection of canceling any of the unfinished checks at the office?
A. No, sir, nor the others either, only I know I did cancel checks, and did it with a chisel—that is about all I know.
From People of the State of New York v. Morris Speigel (December 12, 1892), reprinted in New York Court of Appeals. Records and Briefs (1894):
Q. They gave you a check which had been cancelled, and told you to make a die like the canceller? A. Yes sir.
Q. Did you have any idea that this [die] was intended for a stamp to commit fraud, when you manufactured it? A. No, sir.
Q. Who told you what it was for? Did anybody state to you and tell you what it was for? A. I did not know what it was for; I knew it was for cutting a check, or anything else.
Q. It was a mere check canceller? A. Yes, sir I did not know the purport or whatever it was to be used for.
Q. You do not know now that it was to cut checks— A. No, sir.
Q. Is there anything on it to indicate what it is for? A. It is a cutting die.
Q. Might it cut anything of that shape? A. Yes sir.
From Montague Glass, "The Center of Population," in Munsey's Magazine (August 1908):
At this juncture, Mr. Goodel's only clerical assistant, the sixteen-year-old Jimmie Brennan, entered and deposited a bundle of canceled vouchers on his employer's desk.
"Now, Mr. Goodel," he said, “dat guy at de bank wanted me to sign a receipt for dem cut checks.”
“And did you?” Mr. Goodel asked.
“I did not," Jimmie replied, and produced the unsigned receipt from his breast-pocket.
And from Alden Moore, It's Your Business: Your Use of Your Money to Buy Better (1949) [combined snippets]:
When you pay by check, your cancelled check is your receipt that is indisputable proof of payment. These "cut checks" are all returned to you with the bank's periodical statements of status of your checking account. Some banks also make films showing both sides of each check they pay.
Further complicating this sense of "cut checks" is the fact that in a patent application for "Ticket-Boxes" filed on June 11, 1877, the inventor refer to the device as containing "a machine for cutting pieces or checks from tickets," suggesting that "checks" in that instance referred to something similar to "chads"—and not to "bank checks" at all.
'Cut checks' as created checks
The earliest instance of "cut checks" in the sense of "create or make out checks" that a Google Books search finds is from George Jackson, A New Check Journal, upon the Principle of Double Entry, sixth edition (1841):
In Banking Accounts, we should number both the check and tab of the Check Book ; so that there be corresponding numbers on each : and when we spoil a check, write "cancelled" on the tab, and take the next number, it being a had practice to cut checks from the end of the book to supply deficiencies as we proceed. The checks we cut out for temporary purposes should likewise correspond in number to the tab or margin we cut them from.
From United Sates Patent Office, Annual Report of the Commissioner of Patents for the Year 1870, volume 2 (1872):
103,146. — HAND-STAMP FOR CUTTING CHECKS, BONDS, &c.— John F. Cory and Jacob H. Brown, Brooklyn, E. D., N. Y.
Claim.—1. The spring punches A, provided with cutting -dies representing figures or characters, as set forth, combined with female counter-dies I arranged in a series, and in such a manner that the male and female dies are counterparts of each other respectively, substantially as described.
- The punches A and bed-plate C, provided with female dies I, in combination with the sliding spring holder J, substantially as described.
From The Inland Merchant, volume 2 (1910) [combined snippets]:
An article which has so many ingenious combinations that it becomes a kind sublimated Robinson Crusoe's tool chest is the Kismit Multi-doo. It is a paper cutter that does a whole lot of things besides, and does them satisfactory. Here are some of the other purposes to which it can be put with good results : It will extract pens, cut checks, be used as a copy guide, note book rest, book opener, rule, envelope opener, rule, envelope opener, ink eraser, pen and pencil holder, pencil sharpener, book mark, and last but not least, an automatic paper clip. What more could a person ask of it? It is made of steel highly polished, and retails at 25 cents.
From Schnipper v. Township of North Bergen (New Jersey Superior Court, decided April 11, 1951), reprinted in Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Superior Court, Appellate Division, Chancery Division, Law Division, and in the County Courts of the State of New Jersey (1951):
Our review of the record satisfies us that Mrs. Schnipper did not sustain her burden in this case. Her duties consisted of typing the payroll, cutting payroll checks, sorting payroll vouchers, making entries in certain books and similar activities of a general clerical nature.
So far as appears, bookkeeping as generally understood is not part of the job; the only evidence concerning books is that appellant's duties included the making of some simple entries in cash disbursement books; her work and time were principally devoted to the typing of the payroll, the cutting of payroll checks and the sorting of payroll vouchers.
From what appears to be a caption in The Punched Card Machine Accounting and Data Processing Semi-annual (1952) [snippet view]:
Continuous forms payroll machine for signing, numbering, dating, trimming and cutting checks at high speed.
Also relevant is an ad for a hydraulic paper cutter designed to meet banking needs. The ad ran in both Burroughs Clearing House, volume 44 (1959), and Banking: Journal of the American Bankers Association, volume 52 (1960) [combined snippets]:
Especially designed for accurate, fast production such as cutting checks imprinted with Magnetic Characters, the Chandler & Price Full Hydraulic Power Paper Cutter with Automatic Spacing Attachment also handles cutting for all types of bank forms—ledger cards, statements, deposit slips, letterheads, etc. — speedily, easily and economically.
The Automatic Spacing Attachment provides the facility for repetitive cuts—a great time-saving factor in cutting imprinted checks—without requiring the operator to make precise, visual adjustments of the knife for each cut. Furthermore, absolute accuracy of each cut is assured—a very vital consideration in cutting checks printed with magnetic inks.
The constantly increasing volume of imprinted check production coupled with new methods of handling, sorting and recording requires fast, low-cost, accurate, cutting equipment. The Chandler & Price Full Hydraulic Power Paper Cutter with Automatic Spacing Attachment fully meets the needs of the bank maintaining a printing department.
Examples from Google Books indicate that "cut checks" goes back to the nineteenth century, both in the sense of "create or make out a check" and in the sense of "cancel or spindle a check." From the discussion in George Jackson's 1841 book on accounting, it appears that in that era checks were indeed cut from a master checkbook at need. Advertisements for automated check-cutting machinery have appeared as recently as 1960, suggesting that physical cutting of checks continued to occur (in some settings) more than a century after Jackson addressed the topic.
I assumed this would turn out to be a very old expression, dating from the days when you had to slice the edges of a book's pages with a paper knife before you could read it. To my complete and utter astonishment, however, cut a check and its variations turn out to be almost completely unknown before about 1980.
The earliest real citation I can find comes from District of Columbia Approriations for 1976, a title which I assure you is going on my to-read list immediately:
We did not have to wait 1 week or 3 days to cut a check. We went and pulled it out and matched it with his time sheet, and gave it to him.
It appears, then, that the expression was common enough in the late 70s to be used without requiring explanation, at least among appropriations wonks, but it's hard to see how it can be much older than that without having made an impression on any of the books and periodicals in Google's collection, which is pretty extensive.
As to why the expression might have been coined in the first place, the only thing I can find that might possibly provide a clue is in an equally riveting text, Savings Institutions, Volume 106, Part 1, from 1985:
When you cut a check, really "cut" it! Make sure the payee's name is protected by pinhole perforations so it can't be changed. Make sure the authorized signature is "macerated" so it can't be traced, transferred ... [snippet ends here]
So maybe it has to do with the practice of punching pinholes in a check prior to issuance, as an anti-counterfeiting measure. Looking at this video of a "cheque book perforation machine," it doesn't seem too unreasonable to imagine this being thought of as a "cutting" operation. So maybe that's the answer.
See Clapham, The Bank of England, A History, vol. 1, 144–45. As Clarke mentioned above, it was standard practice in the 18th century, when cheques first became widely circulated in England (and a period that seems to have eluded this entire discussion!) to literally cut cheques from their stubs in an erratic pattern, in the same manner as for promissory notes. I do believe that is, in fact, the origin of the term "to cut a cheque". The meaning of a cancelled cheque is a much later false friend/neologism derived from this earlier practice.
It seems a common expression in the business sector, American English. Several dictionaries have this expression or special collocation, but, of course, an explanation how cutting is involved, is lacking. The normal expression would be "to write/give/sent someone a check". I personally don't like this style of language. If some people use such fanciful metaphors for simple ideas to show they are the professional type of people, okay, but I prefer clear and simple expressions to nonsensical ones.
See "to cut a check" in dict.cc or The free dictionary.
My Model 74 Protectograph, was my grandfathers. I'm 71 today. The check imprinter used black and red ink on the amount line. Besides the inking, it put little horizontal cuts in all the words and numbers. It was a business anti-fraud measure. That's why cutting a check applied to business checks, but not personal ones.
I started using checks in NYC in the early 60's. The checks in my checkbook were perforated over 50 years ago. No one ever used the term to "cut a check" regarding personal checks; you "wrote" or "sent" them. It was, however common usage in business offices.
My recollection is that only official checks such as payroll, government and refund checks were "cut." So I suspect that in the equipment used to prepare large numbers of checks, checks were, as a last step, cut - perhaps detached from the duplicate to be kept in file.
This fits in with an earlier posting that cited savings banks procedures. No individual perforates a check.
The term may very well relate to cutting a check out of a printed book, however from my personal experience, there's also this . . . I believe the term came from the machines that applied a signature to the check. It is clamped between two plates, one of them being inked, and they used raised surfaces that embosses the signature onto the check and the result has actual cuts to the paper. You can see the ink and feel the embossing. Compare it to a Notary's stamp (before they switched to just ink stamps). Similar, but a check cutting machine literally cut the paper where the signature was applied. I used such a machine back in the day at First Atlanta (before it merged with Wachovia which then merged with Wells Fargo).
The seemingly obvious answer to me is that in an old-school business, checks come in a bound book, three to a page. One has to cut the check out of the book, with the stub still attached to the book. They are perforated, so technically you don't need scissors but I still did anyway because I would otherwise tear many checks and I imagine they weren't always perforated.