I know that the proper pronunciation of 'arguable' is /ɑr gju ə bəl/. I do not doubt.

But it often bothers me when reading this word, that it somehow sounds like 'argu r able'.

While not sure, I think I have heard people pronouncing this word that way.

Is this also an accepted alternative pronunciation of this word? I'm asking this question as a non-native English speaker.

  • 10
    I've never heard it pronounced that way. – Blessed Geek Oct 9 '14 at 6:09
  • Perhaps your mind is trying to over apply an intrusive r, or, alternatively someone you know has the somewhat common (for kids, anyways) R-W speech impediment. I think most people probably have an ever-so-slight W on the syllable with the unstressed a. – user0721090601 Nov 8 '14 at 16:05
  • I've always pronounced it roughly "arg-ya-uh-bull". (Though "ya" isn't quite right -- somewhere between "you" and "ya". And, of course, it's all run together fairly tightly -- there's just a barely detectable transition between the "a" and the "u".) – Hot Licks Mar 8 '15 at 13:16
  • I would not be surprised to hear it with the injected "R" sound, from someone from the northeast US, or rural mideast US. – Hot Licks Mar 8 '15 at 13:20
  • 1
    On a related, though reversed, note, I have spent most of tonight watching semi-bad crime shows on TV, and I have heard twice in one night the word barbiturate pronounced without the second /r/, as ‘barbituate’. Perhaps there's some emerging change of the sequence /u(r)ə/ going on… – Janus Bahs Jacquet Mar 12 '15 at 2:57

I think I've heard that. Maybe it's the intrusive r that turns up after schwa and before a vowel in the eastern US dialect that John Kennedy spoke. If the vowels of the second and third syllables are both reduced, you get [ɑɹgjəəbl] with two schwas next to each other, and that is a favorable place for a glide to be inserted. A similar word is "arduous" which could get to [ɑɹdjəəs] -- I wonder if you ever get an r there, too.


I've never heard "argu r able", and I would not describe it as an "accepted alternative pronunciation".

It seems fairly plausible to me that some people might use this pronunciation, because there is an /r/, or an R-colored vowel, earlier in the word. Words with multiple R sounds are somewhat prone to losing one (via "dissimilation"), and somewhat less commonly, words with a single R sound may have variant pronunciations with more than one due to "assimilation" (as with sherbet, which has a variant pronunciation "sherbert"). See my answer to 'Forward' pronounced more often as 'foward'? for some more information about this phenomenon.

Variation between /ju/ and /jər/ before a vowel is known to occur in at least one other word, barbiturate (which has the stigmatized variant barbituate, as mentioned in a comment by Janus Bahs Jacquet).

  • Wouldn’t it be more likely to be variation between /ju/ and /jʊr/? Probably /ʊ/ and /ə/ are merged between /j/ and /r/ for most people, but where they are kept separate, I would imagine the variation here would favour /ʊ/. At least that’s I have /-ˡbɪtʃʊrət/ in words like barbiturate, forming an almost minimal pair with a bitcher had… with /-ˡbɪtʃərəd/. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Nov 17 '18 at 16:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.