2

For example, if you had a bunch of strangers baking cookies, you might say

The cookies produced were [adjective].

Meaning there were both good and bad results in the set.

Or:

Jean went out in a tight fitting short skirt. The reactions she got were [adjective].

2

5 Answers 5

10

I think contrasting ( also conflicting) can fit in your second example:

  • different, especially with strong dissimilarities , between entities or objects compared.

or mixed:

  • Composed of a variety of differing, sometimes conflicting entities: viewed the change in management with mixed emotions; a closet full of mixed outfits.

As for the biscuits I think you have to be more specific saying 'that they were not all good'.

Source: www.thefreedictionary.com

3
  • Mmm, I think I'm wanting to highlight the bad in the set.
    – dwjohnston
    Commented Oct 4, 2014 at 6:22
  • 1
    @dwjohnston - you are asking for a mix of good and bad in your question. You should be more specific in your request if you want to stress one aspect (bad) vs the other ( good).
    – user66974
    Commented Oct 4, 2014 at 6:25
  • Yeah, I'm being difficult. The answer given certainly fits the question posed. :)
    – dwjohnston
    Commented Oct 4, 2014 at 6:27
4

I know "mixed" was given above, but I don't think it's as accurate as

mixed bag (idiomatic) something tending to have both good and bad results or characteristics; something having a mixture of advantages and disadvantages.

The results of the cookie competition were a mixed bag.

Source : http://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/mixed_bag

0

Although so-so means neither very good nor very bad, Merriam-Webster, it seemingly fits your tone and content, in that none were outstanding in any way. You could say ranged but you'd sound like a stiff using it as a single word.

The cookies produced were so-so.

The cliche, "varied reactions":

Jean received varied reactions when she went out in a tight fitting short skirt.

She also got "assorted looks".

0

If you're looking to highlight the bad, then a good expression would be a "curate's egg" as in, "the results were a bit of a curate's egg" :

The expression itself comes from an old Punch cartoon caption;

Bishop: "I'm afraid you've got a bad egg, Mr Jones"
Curate: "Oh, no, my Lord, I assure you that parts of it are excellent!"

enter image description here
"True Humility" by George du Maurier, originally published in Punch, 9 November 1895.

1
  • 1
    That's a great phrase, but I don't think most Americans would recognize it. It might be a strictly a UKism.
    – keshlam
    Commented Oct 4, 2014 at 15:46
-1

I think you could use, poise, equipoise, equilibrium, or stasis. They all have the same definition: A condition in which opposing forces are equal to one another.

If you're sneaky, you could use aplomb, which means: Evenness of emotions or temper.

Antipodal and diametric mean: Being as different as possible.

1
  • As it’s currently written, your answer is unclear. Please edit to add additional details that will help others understand how this addresses the question asked. You can find more information on how to write good answers in the help center.
    – Community Bot
    Commented May 28, 2022 at 3:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .