Would valid to make sense when refering to an expiration date? I've got this text right now:

Valid from: 01/10/2014
Valid to: 10/10/2014

It doesn't sound correct. Should it be until?

In which cases can I use to and not until?

  • 1
    Whichever you pick, please don't use the construction found in some contest ad disclaimers: 'Offer ends October 10th or while supplies last'. – Jim Mack Oct 1 '14 at 18:21
  • Why not, @JimMack? – Dunning-Kruger Oct 2 '14 at 20:59
  • Seriously? "Offer ends...while supplies last" was common (and much mocked) a few years ago, from fast food joints with promotional giveaways. – Jim Mack Oct 2 '14 at 21:50
  • Didn't know that. However, why was it mocked? It makes sense to me. – Dunning-Kruger Oct 2 '14 at 22:42
  • Because it's contradictory. The offer continues or is valid while supplies last. It ends when supplies are exhausted. – Jim Mack Oct 3 '14 at 0:26

Both "to" and "until" can imply that the item is not valid on the end-date specified, but only up to that date.

"Valid through" would imply that it was valid through that final end-date, and eliminates any possible misinterpretation.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.