0

Cats are carnivores
Cats are carnivorous
Cats are carnivorous animals

I often hear people say those sentences and I wonder which among them is/are correct. And are there any differences in meaning or focus among the three sentences?

10
  • 3
    They are all valid and essentially mean the same thing.
    – Jim
    Sep 27, 2014 at 5:25
  • 1
    @Jim They are all valid but do not mean the same thing.
    – Kris
    Sep 27, 2014 at 5:26
  • 6
    @Kris- waiting to pounce I see. That's why I said essentially. Obviously the 3rd admits to a cat being an animal while the 1st only implies it because a carnivore is an animal that eats meat. The second uses carnivorous which just attaches the qualities of being a carnivore to the cat. But all this is evident by the words that are present in each. There is no subtle hidden difference that a native speaker would perceive that a non-native speaker would miss. They are all quite straightforward in their meanings, which is: Cats eat meat.
    – Jim
    Sep 27, 2014 at 5:30
  • 3
    @Jim bravo and correct.
    – Mari-Lou A
    Sep 27, 2014 at 7:32
  • 1
    Sundews are carnivorous. Sep 27, 2014 at 17:03

1 Answer 1

2

Apart from emphasis and rhythm, the only difference I can think of is that in certain contexts, "carnivore" could refer very specifically to a member of the order Carnivora. However, an actual scientist would probably say "carnivoran" or "member of the order Carnivora," and most people don't make the distinction, so that's rare.

1
  • Of course not all members of Carnivora are actually carnivorous.
    – Colin Fine
    Sep 28, 2014 at 11:30

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.