5

I'm having difficulty in understanding the differences in usage (and understanding which one is used from pronunciation/context) between "loathe" and "loath" - could anyone help clarify it ?

11

'Loathe' is a verb used to indicate repugnance:

I loathe Brussels sprouts.

'Loath' is an adjective suggesting unwillingness or reluctance:

I am loath to eat my Brussels sprouts.

As for pronunciation, they both rhyme with 'loan' as far as the vowel sound is concerned, but 'loathe' ends with a 'th' sound as in 'the', whereas 'loath' has a 'th' as in 'thing'. This is based on my experience as an Australian English speaker who rarely says either of these words!

  • 1
    +1 -- I also note that "loathe" often draws out the vowel a bit i.e. "loooooooowthe". – Billy ONeal Apr 7 '11 at 7:38
  • 1
    Also valid in American English. – Mechanical snail Oct 12 '11 at 0:32
3

There are several pairs of words in English where the verb has a voiced 'th' (/ð/) and the other form has it unvoiced (/θ/).

Usually there is a difference in spelling ("loath"/"loathe"; "wreath"/"wreathe"), but sometimes not ("mouth"/"mouth"). Sometimes the vowel sound changes as well ("breath"/"breathe"; "bath"/"bathe").

In most cases the 'non-verb' is a noun, but in this case "loath" is an adjective. However it is a slightly odd one, in that you can say "I'm nothing loath to ... ": I can't think of any other words that will go in this construction.

"Loath" is also rather rare in modern English.

0

Loathe is used to express hatred/dislike/disgust whereas loath is used to express unwillingness/reluctant attitude.

  • There is nothing wrong with this answer. Any particular reason why this was downvoted? – Uticensis Apr 7 '11 at 15:13
  • While not as detailed as the other answer, this is still a useful answer in a nutshell - I've upvoted you :) – TCSGrad Apr 7 '11 at 15:16
  • My problem with this answer is that it makes the two sound like they're the same except for the slightly different meaning. They're not; "loath" is not a verb and "loathe" is not an adjective, so you couldn't just replace one with the other. (Not my downvote, but if it were, that'd be why.) – cHao May 31 '12 at 19:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.