As a non-English speaker whose native language does not have articles I am always unsure about the use of them. This time I would like to clarify the use of the article "THE" together with positions of persons. For example:

John Smith and the director of my department Adam Gray went to a meeting yesterday.

If I state the name of the person do I need "THE"? I understand that if I said just "John and the director of my department went..." "THE" would be necessary but does that change when stating the name also?

Similarly, do I need to put "THE" in this type of sentence:

The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom David Cameron announced changes in immigration policy.

If I don't need the definite article here then why so? Are the two examples equal?

2 Answers 2


You can use them with or without an article, but the meaning is ever so slightly different. When you use them without the definite article, THE, then you are using an official title. Grammatically it is like a name, it's a Proper Noun. In this case you need to use capital letters for the title: Managing Director, for example.

When you use the titles or positions without an article, that's just a description of the person's job. Its a bit like saying I'm a teacher. So we can say:

  • Managing Director of Leo LT, Kestutis Sliuzas ...


  • The managing director of Leo LT, Kestutis Sliuzas ...

The first is a title, the second a description. When we are using the second form we have the option to use capitals if we want to: The Managing Director ...

In the Original Poster's example:

  • John Smith and the director of my department Adam Gray went to a meeting yesterday.

We need to use the definite article here. The reason is that the director of my department is a description, not an official title. However if you wanted to use a title you could:

  • John Smith and Director of Marketing, Adam Gray, both attended the meeting.

This is similar to how we use proper noun titles like King or common noun descriptions like king.

  • The king of my country is an idiot.
  • King of Spain, Felipe VI was asked yesterday ...

Hope his is helpful!

  • OK, I see that there is a lot of flexibility in these cases. Sep 26, 2014 at 11:40
  • With presidents and prime Ministers etc, if you use THE and capital letters when you use the person's name, you will almost never be wrong. Sep 26, 2014 at 11:50
  • Wait, I'm confused now. You are saying that if you're not using the position like a formal title, then don't use THE. So in your example "The managing director of Leo LT, Kestutis Sliuzas..." the position is not a formal title but THE is used. I don't get it. Sep 26, 2014 at 11:58
  • Ouch! I edited that because I thought 'name' was ambiguous there and reposted it in a hurry. It should say: But if you're not using the position like a formal title, then always USE THE! If you are using it like a formal title then use capitals (it doesn't matter too much about THE in this situation, the capitals already make it official and formal). Sorry, and thanks for pointing that out! It would be very misleading!! Sep 26, 2014 at 12:06
  • All is clear now! Sep 26, 2014 at 12:38

It largely depends on how you put it.

The way you have expressed it in the example, including the definite article would be usual, though not essential. You could just about get away with saying:

JS, and Director of my department, Adam Gray, went to a meeting yesterday - but it doesn't sound right.

However if you said:

JS, and Adam Gray, Director of my department, went to a meeting; the article is more easily dropped.

Or you could say:

David Cameron, Prime Minister of the UK, made a speech to the Security Council.

But if you put the title first you really need the article.

  • Is there any rule related to these examples? At the moment I am still not sure why the article is needed/not needed. Sep 26, 2014 at 10:50
  • @IngaVaiciakauskaite I suppose you first need to examine why we use articles in English, whilst other languages manage without them. I believe the default, in English, is that you use an article. But it has become accepted over time that in certain contexts one can drop the article for convenience sake.
    – WS2
    Sep 26, 2014 at 11:04
  • @Araucaria Point taken.
    – WS2
    Sep 26, 2014 at 12:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.