English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
1.1. [consist in] = Have as an essential feature
How did the Latin com- + sistere compound to mean 1.1 above? It may help to read ODO's own conjecture of the etymology (see the link above).
[Etymonline for consist (v.) :] 1520s, from Middle French consister (14c.) or directly from Latin consistere "to stand firm, take a standing position, stop, halt,"
from com- "together" (see com-) + sistere "to place," causative of stare "to stand, be standing" (see stay (v.)). Related: Consisted; consisting.
The Latin word consisto already had this (additional) sense, according to Lewis & Short:
2. (According to I. B. 2.) To be or remain firm, unshaken, immovable, steadfast, to be at rest, to stand one's ground, to continue, endure, subsist, be, exist ...
...
4. In general, to be, exist ...
4 (b). With in, ex, or the simple ablative (in Quintilian also with circa and inter; vide infra), to consist in or of, to depend upon:
“major pars victūs eorum in lacte, caseo, carne consistit,” Caes. B. G. 6, 22: “omnis per se natura duabus Constitit in rebus,” Lucr. 1, 420: “e quibus haec rerum summa consistat,” id. 1, 236; so with ex, id. 1, 839; 1, 873 al.; with abl.: “deveniunt in talis disposturas, Qualibus haec rerum consistit summa,” id. 1, 1028; 5, 61; 5, 66: “vita omnis in venationibus atque in studiis rei militaris consistit,” Caes. B. G. 6, 21: “in eo salus et vita optimi cujusque consistit,” Cic. Phil. 3, 8, 19: “in hoc summa judicii causaque tota consistit,” id. Quint. 9, 32; cf. id. de Or. 1, 40, 182: “causam belli in personā tuā,” id. Phil. 2, 22, 53: “in quibus vita beata,” id. Tusc. 5, 14, 40: “in unā honestate omne bonum,” id. ib. 5, 14, 42: “in nomine controversia,” Quint. 7, 3, 7; 8, 3, 57: “in actu rhetoricen,” id. 2, 18, 2; 6, 3, 42: “spes omnis consistebat Datami in se locique naturā,” Nep. Dat. 8, 3.—With abl., Quint. 12, 10, 59: “omnis quaestio circa res personasque consistere videtur,” id. 3, 5, 7; 6, 3, 19: “quaestio inter utile atque honestum consistet,” id. 3, 8, 24. —
So the word already had this meaning in classical Latin, which makes its post-classical history irrelevant. Con-sisto literally means "stand together in x" in Latin.
As to how it acquired this meaning in Latin, I do not know.
Adding the prefix con- "together" to the verb sisto, "to (cause to) stand", resulted in the meaning "to go and stand (somewhere), to stop, to stand still".
Lewis & Short (see above) suggest that it more or less went from "stand together, stand firm" to "be/exist" to "be in essence" to "be represented in essence in [a thing or quality]".
But con- also often indicates that the action represented by the simple (= without affixes) verb comes to a natural end, as can perhaps be seen in conclude, convert, confer. The end 'comes together' with the beginning of the action, as it were. Sisto/sto "stand" is often close in meaning to "be" and "exist", as can be observed in existo as well, which means "to stand out, to exist".
It is possible that consisto went from "stand together" to "stand complete" to "be complete" to "be in essence" to "be represented in essence in [a thing or quality]". But perhaps we would be wiser to follow Lewis & Short.
I don't think the exact semanto-etymological path is known.
Note that a somewhat similar path is also present in Germanic, as in Dutch:
staan = to stand
bestaan = to (continue to) exist
bestaan uit = to consist of
bestaan in = to consist in
Perhaps this originates in a loan translation from Latin. That is certainly possible for bestaan uit and bestaan in, but hardly for bestaan "exist", because that use already existed in Old Dutch and Old High German.
stand together in x evolved to mean Have as an essential feature? I'm confused because I'm guessing: 'Y stands together in X' = 'X has an essential feature, Y.'. So the order is reversed? Where did I err?
don't follow your reasoning that 'Y stands together in X' = 'X has an essential feature, Y', though: please see my changed OP. I try to explain this more clearly. Better?
con-: together, with
sist: derived from Latin "sistere", meaning "stand"
So consist means:
Stand together/with.
Usage1：cosist of
A is B of standing together.
=>
A is B of consisting.
as time goes on, it turns slowly into：
A consists of B.
So "consist of" turns into the meaning: "to be formed from two or more things".
Usage2：consist in
A stands with in (within) B.
So "consist in" means “to exist in or depend on something”.
For more details, you can visit page: https://boercade.com/index.php?title=Consist
