From page 69 of Frederick Shauer’s Thinking Like a Lawyer:

A New York state court may cite to a case decided in Vermont . . . The courts are not even required to cite to these “authorities,” let alone follow them.

Why does this use cite to? Why isn’t it simply cite?

What are the similarites and differences?

closed as off-topic by tchrist, Robusto, Janus Bahs Jacquet, anongoodnurse, choster Jul 15 '14 at 15:59

  • This question does not appear to be about English language and usage within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.