See this sentence:
Partner A will have a contract with our company with following missions:...
It can be written into two separate sentences:
- Partner A will have a contract with our company.
- The contract has the following missions:...
If I write
A contract with our company with following missions
like as in the first sentence, then would it cause a certain ambiguity or not?
A better wording would be:
... a contract with our company that has the following missions: ...
This eliminates the ambiguity about which noun with attaches to. Unless it's clear from context, when you have a string of prepositional phrases, each attaches to the noun immediately before it. For example, in
the house on the end of the street next to the river,
the street is next to the river, and not the house. You can fix this by inserting an and:
the house on the end of the street and next to the river.
So you could also fix the OP's sentence as follows:
a contract with our company and with the following missions: ...
but I don't like that as much in this case because the two with's are used in different senses.
