1

so another question I have is that whether it is systematic (a regular pattern) between /a:/ in BrE and /æ:/ in AmE or not.

There are words that a pronounced differently like dance or rather. I have one source which indicates that this contrast is not systematic but restricted to 80 words.

Then there is a passage which I do not understand I cite "For example, while the word pass is pronounced as expected in R.P. (/pa:s/), the word standard has /æ/." - So what exactly is meant by standard since it is written in italic. I also though that in Am it is always the /æ:/ pronunciation and BrE always /a:/

I have thought the entire time that there is a systematic phonological difference!

thx,

  • In RP, the 'a' in pass and the first 'a' in standard are different vowels. Oxford Dictionaries Online labels these vowels /ɑː/ and /a/, so /pɑːs/ and /ˈstandəd/. My guess is that your source is labeling them /a:/ and /æ:/, which is really confusing and probably less correct. – Peter Shor Jun 24 '14 at 19:41
  • @PeterShor Oh I am sorry I meant the /ɑ:/ instead of /a/ I forgot to write it in correct IPA! so everywhere were I used /a/ it is actually /ɑ:/!!!! – tima Jun 24 '14 at 19:43
  • :) thanks, I need to read it again since I am a little confused but I am curious to know if there is a systematic difference or not. :) – tima Jun 24 '14 at 19:52
  • @PeterShor thanks again :) but why does one source say there is no systematic difference while the other does. – tima Jun 24 '14 at 20:04
  • 1
    It's systematic if you can always decide whether it's /æ/ or /ɑ:/ just by looking at the phonemes in the word. But here you can only guess correctly most of the time; sometimes you'll be wrong. So it's not-quite-systematic. Does that count as systematic or not? It's certainly not true that /æ/ in AmE goes to /ɑ:/ in British English. – Peter Shor Jun 24 '14 at 20:07
1

Part of the answer to your question is the change that occurred. By and large, English spelling is conservative and reflects pronunciation from an earlier period.

Here's Barber, Beal & Shaw, The English Language, 2nd edn., p. 227.

Before the voiceless fricatives /f/, /s/, and /θ/, short [æ], from ME [Middle English] a, became lengthened to [æː], which later became [aː], and then [ɑː]

Hence the RP vowels in laugh, pass and path.

If you listen to Australian English for these words, you'll hear [aː] rather than [ɑː] - in other words, long vowels, but a front rather than a back vowel. The Australian vowel represents the British vowel around the 19th century.

The main point is that [ɑː] is restricted to certain words.

|improve this answer|||||

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.