0

I have a question about the sentence "The evolution of a process admits the following description". I checked then the phrase "admits the following description" in Ngram Viewer and found no occurrence. Neither did I found for "allows the following description". Is there something wrong with them? In case it is, what are appropriate substitutions?

7
  • 1
    Don't expect Ngrams to find occurrences of all grammatical phrases; the graph flatlines if there are two few of them to make a good chart of the fluctuations in frequency over time. There are a number of Google hits for both these phrases, and I see nothing wrong with either of them. Jun 24, 2014 at 14:22
  • 2
    The construction of admit with a situational subject and a descriptional object is just one (fairly formal) way to provide a description of a situation. Quite often there are several possible descriptions available, and one finds phrases like this admits (of) several explanations/descriptions: ... Jun 24, 2014 at 14:24
  • 1
    @John: I was just about to comment that I personally would probably include of in most instances of this construction - perhaps precisely because it's a relatively formal/uncommon usage for most contexts (the preposition makes it easier to recognise as something of a "stock phrase" only loosely related to the more common admit = confess sense). Jun 24, 2014 at 14:32
  • @FumbleFingers The definitions for admit that have the meaning here ("allow the possibility of") all seem to be intransitive. That would seem to therefore require the "of" or a similar prepositional phrase to specify what they allow...or am I reading too much into the intransitiveness?
    – JeffSahol
    Jun 24, 2014 at 14:55
  • 1
    But really, why would one want to write that instead of, "the evolution of a process can be described as follows..."?
    – Jim
    Jun 24, 2014 at 15:55

1 Answer 1

1

There is nothing wrong with that phrasing. I agree with John Lawler's comment that it is formal, or possibly stilted speech, but still correct. I would suspect that the usage might flow out of trying to passive tense.

Substitutions I might use:

  • (can be | is) described as follows
  • fits this description
  • may be defined as (though a definition is admittedly stronger than a description)
  • has been defined as (followed by citations, if the work is not original)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.