As medica pointed out in comments, "Possible + countable noun can take an indefinite article (a/some) but best necessitates a definite article." So in everyday English one would only ever say "the best possible".
The mathematics link establishes a convention used by that particular author. It says:
"Best possible". "Best possible" is an adjective; it indicates sharpness. We write "This result is best possible", just as we would write "This result is sharp". Writing "This result is the best possible" says that this result is better or more valuable aesthetically than all other results in the world, which is not what is meant. The definite article should not be used here. Think of "best possible" as a technical term that is already a specific predicate adjective, so no definite article is needed.
Whether that convention is more widespread among other mathematicians, I can't say. I've never encountered it personally among numerous math/science/engineering classes.
Obviously scientific/technical fields make up technical terms all the time, but when you take words that have established meaning and use them in a completely counter-intuitive way, you're just begging to be misunderstood.
"Best possible" uses the superlative. Whether you include the definite article or not, it clearly implies that the result is the best among all possible results- which is completely the opposite of what the author supposedly wants to say.